摘要
杜诗学研究及《杜甫研究学刊》今日所遇之难题,很大程度上是现行学术评价体制造成的,深层说则是当今学界于杜甫研究上因既有研究成果过于丰富而来的“持续乏力”所致.文献学与文艺学、甚至是哲学美学的互动交融,应是杜甫研究所可能有的理论开拓,这源于文献考证与哲学思辨,本质上是同一种心力的不同表现.本文以对“诗史”的哲学解读以及对杜诗与原始儒家在运思方式上承续关系的研究为例,佐证了上述认识.
Difficulties encountered in Du Fu's Research Journal and Du Fu's Study of Poetics in the present time are largely caused by the culTent academic evaluation system.And the abundant research achievements in the study of Du Fu today lead to the“continuous weakness”.which is the deepest problem of this academic field It is the interactive blend of philology,literary and philosophical aesthetics that could contains all the possihilities of theoretical develc,pment,which stems from the 1iterature research and philosophical speculation.And this method is essentially the sal-lle mind ability of different performance.This article demonstrates the above understanding,which through the philosophical interpretation of“history of poetry"and the continuing relationship between Du Fu’S poetics and the original Confucianism in the way of thinking.
出处
《古代文学理论研究》
CSSCI
2018年第2期454-468,共15页
Studies of Ancient Chinese Literary Theory
基金
安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目“诗史关系的哲学辨正”(SK2012A147).
关键词
杜诗学
《杜甫研究学刊》
文献学与文艺学
诗史
原始儒家
academics about Du Fu’s poetry
Du Fu’s Research Journal
philology and literary studies
Poetic History
Primitive Confucianism
