期刊文献+

细胞块p16/Ki-67双染对子宫颈炎患者宫颈上皮内瘤变的诊断价值 被引量:2

Evaluation on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia for patients with cervicitis by p16/Ki-67 double staining
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨基于细胞块技术p16/Ki-67双染对非典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASC-US)/低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)患者的宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2级以上(≥CIN2)的诊断价值。方法收集2021年1月至2021年12月北京市海淀区妇幼保健院收治的222例子宫颈炎患者,均接受阴道镜活检、DNA倍体分析和高危人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)检测,细胞学结果均为ASC-US/LSIL病例,对患者剩余的液基细胞学(LBC)标本进行基于细胞块技术的p16/Ki-67双染,绘制受试者操作者特征(ROC)曲线比较细胞块p16/Ki-67双染与DNA倍体分析和HR-HPV对≥CIN2病变的诊断价值。结果细胞块p16/Ki-67双染Kappa值为0.835,与活检病理诊断结果高度一致。细胞块p16/Ki-67双染ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.900(特异性和敏感度分别为94.16%和85.45%),HR-HPV检测AUC为0.557(特异性和敏感度分别为13.17%和98.18%),DNA倍体分析AUC为0.583(特异性和敏感度分别为32.93%和83.64%);细胞块p16/Ki-67双染AUC显著高于HR-HPV检测(Z=11.387、P<0.001)和DNA倍体分析(Z=7.476、P<0.001),差异有统计学意义。与HR-HPV检测和DNA倍体分析相比,细胞块p16/Ki-67双染NRI值分别为1.470(95%CI:1.246~1.470、P<0.001)和1.278(95%CI:1.049~1.278、P<0.001);IDI值分别为0.609(95%CI:0.525~0.692、P<0.001)和0.633%(95%CI:0.554~0.713,P<0.001)。结论基于细胞块p16/Ki-67双染对于≥CIN2患者的正确分类有更好的预测,是ASC-US/LSIL患者分流的良好方法,可有效避免过度诊断和治疗。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of p16/Ki-67 double staining based on cell block technology for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN)higher than grade 2(≥CIN2)for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance(ASC-US)/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions(LSIL).Methods From January 2021 to December 2021,a total of 222 patients with cervicitis who underwent colposcopy biopsy,DNA ploidy analysis and high risk human papillomarirus(HR-HPV)testing were selected from Beijing Haidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital.Cytological results of all cases were ASC-US/LSIL.The remaining liquid based cytology(LBC)specimens of patients were stained with p16/Ki-67 double staining based on cell block technology,and the diagnostic value of p16/Ki-67 double staining compared with DNA ploidy analysis and HR-HPV for≥CIN2 lesions were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC).Results The Kappa value of p16/Ki-67 double staining in cell block was 0.835,which was highly consistent with the pathological diagnosis of biopsy.The area under ROC(AUC)of p16/Ki-67 double staining was 0.900(the specificity and sensitivity were 94.16%and 85.45%,respectively),which was significantly higher than that of HR-HPV testing(AUC was 0.557,with the specificity and sensitivity were 13.17%and 98.18%,respectively)(Z=11.387,P<0.001)and DNA ploidy analysis(AUC was 0.583,with the specificity and sensitivity were 32.93%and 83.64%,respectively)(Z=7.476,P<0.001),with significant differences.Compared with HR-HPV testing and DNA ploidy analysis,the NRI values of p16/Ki-67 double staining were 1.470(95%CI:1.246-1.470,P<0.001)and 1.278(95%CI:1.049-1.278,P<0.001),respectively.The IDI values were 0.609(95%CI:0.525-0.692,P<0.001)and 0.633(95%CI:0.554-0.713,P<0.001),respectively.Conclusions The p16/Ki-67 double staining based on cell block has a better predictive ability for the correct classification of patients≥CIN2,and is a good method for the triage of patients with ASC-US/LSIL,which can effectively avoid the over-diagnosis and treatment.
作者 孙笑非 顾依群 王爱春 王荔 孟凡凡 王军 卢利娟 Sun Xiaofei;Gu Yiqun;Wang Aichun;Wang Li;Meng Fanfan;Wang Jun;Lu lijuan(Department of Pathology,Haidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Beijing 100080,China)
出处 《中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2022年第6期418-425,共8页 Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition)
基金 北京市海淀区卫生健康发展科研培育计划(No.HP2021-31-10301)
关键词 宫颈癌筛查 p16/Ki-67双染 不明的非典型鳞状上皮细胞 低级别鳞状上皮内病变 细胞块 宫颈上皮内瘤变 Cervical cancer screening p16/Ki-67 double staining Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance Low-grade squamous intraepithelial leasion Cell block Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1Tavassoli FA,Devilee P.WHO classification of tumours.Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs[M].Lyon:IARC Press,2003.
  • 2Kurman R J,Carcangiu ML,Herrington CS,et al.WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs[M].4th ed.Lyon:IARC Press,2014.
  • 3Bell DA,Weinstock MA,Scully RE.Peritoneal implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors.Histologic features and prognosis[J].Cancer,1988,62(10):2212-2222.
  • 4Smith Sehdev AE,Sehdev PS,Kurman RJ.Noninvasive and invasive micropapillary (low-grade) serous carcinoma of the ovary:a clinicopathologic analysis of 135 cases[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2003,27(6):725-736.
  • 5Prat J,De Nictolis M.Serous borderline tumors of the ovary:a long-term follow-up study of 137 cases,including 18 with a micropapillary pattern and 20 with microinvasion[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2002,26(9):1111-1128.
  • 6Malpica A,Deavers MT,Lu K,et al.Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2004,28(4):496-504.
  • 7Malpica A,Deavers MT,Tornos C,et al.Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2007,31 (8):1168-1174.
  • 8Malpica A.Grading of ovarian cancer:a histotype-specific approach[J].Int J Gynecol Pathol,2008,27(2):175-181.
  • 9Rodriguez IM,Irving JA,Prat J.Endocervical-like mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary:a clinicopathologic analysis of 31cases[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2004,28(10):1311-1318.
  • 10Mutter GL,Baak JP,Crum CP,et al.Endometrial precancer diagnosis by histopathology,clonal analysis,and computerized morphometry[J].J Pathol,2000,190(4):462-469.

共引文献95

同被引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部