摘要
对于中国的补贴问题,美国试图从单边以及多边层面向中国施压。从单边层面来看,美国力图修改其反补贴法明确对中国适用反补贴法,商务部也试图改变其一贯的做法对中国适用反补贴措施。在美国立法对此问题未予以明确前,中国可以利用对乔治城钢铁公司案判决存在不同的理解,从法律与技术层面反驳美国的主张。从多边层面看,由于普遍认同反补贴法可以适用于非市场经济国家,美国指控的中国相关措施可能违背WTO法的规定,但是中国政府可以采取相应的策略以做出有利于自己的安排。
For the subsidies dispute between China and U.S,United States is trying to solve them from unilateral and multilateral perspective.In unilateral way,U.S is amending its relevant subsidies law to clarify that CVD can apply to NME,at the same time Commerce is changing its customary practices.To succeed in challenging U.S’unilateral action,China can make use of the case of Georgetown Steel.From multilateral perspective,the subsidies U.S complained against China may not conform to WTO rules,but China well can use this opportunity.
出处
《重庆三峡学院学报》
2007年第6期97-103,共7页
Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University
