企业连锁董事的形成机理及其实证分析——基于我国160家上市公司的经验研究被引量：6

下载PDF

导出

摘要文章从实证的角度对我国连锁董事的影响因素及形成机理进行尝试性探讨。通过对我国160家上市公司的实证分析,得出公司规模、行业因素、风险水平与企业间连锁不相关,连锁董事对企业绩效不会造成显著影响的结论;并进一步指出,用阶层领导理论来解释我国的连锁董事现象比用资源依赖理论更具说服力,并提出潜在的研究议题和今后的研究方向。

作者段海艳仲伟周

机构地区西安交通大学经济与金融学院

出处《生产力研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第24期68-70,75,共4页 Productivity Research

基金西安交通大学"985工程"二期项目(07200701)的项目资助

关键词连锁董事形成机理资源依赖理论阶层领导理论实证分析

分类号 F279.246 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1[1]Burr RS.1983.Corporate Profits and Cooptation.New York:Academic.
2[2]Carrington PJ.198 1.Horizontal co-optation through corporate interlocks.phD THESIS.Dept.Social.Univ.Toronto.
3[3]Fligstcin.N.＆Brantley.P.1992.Bank control,owner control,or organizational dynamics:Who eonhrols the large modem corporation?American Journal of Socioloty,98:280-307.
4[4]Kocning T.1979.Interlocking directorates among the largest American corporations and their significance for corporate political activity.PhD thesis.Dept.Social.Univ.Calif.Santa Barbara.
5[5]Keening T and Gogel,D.1990.Increased Environmental Uncertainty and Changes in Board Linkage Patterns.Academy of Management Journal.33.106-128.
6[6]Lang JR ＆Lockhart DE.1990.Increased environmental uncertainty and changes in board linkage patterns.Anad.Man.J 33:106-128.
7[7]Mizrechi M.S 1983.Who Controls Whom?An Examination of the Relation Between Management and Boards of Directors in Large American Corporations.AcademyofManagementReview 8:426-435.
8[8]Palmer D.1983.Broken ties:interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination.Admin.Sci.Q.28:40-55.
9[9]Pennings,J.M.1980.Interlocking directorates.San Francisco;Jossey-Bass.
10[10]Sheard P.1993.An analysis of the supply of executives by banks to boards of large Japanese firms.Pres.Inst.Asian Res.Conf.on Netw.Action &Org.in Japan.Univ.Br.Columbia.

二级参考文献40

1Linda Brewster Stearus,Mark S. Mizruchi. Broken-tie Reconstitution and the Function of Organizational Interlocks : A Re-examination[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, (31 ).
2Mark S. Mizruchi,Linda Brewster Stearns. A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1988, (33).
3Michael Ornstein. Interlocking Directorates in Canada:Inter-corporate or Class Alliance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, (29).
4Pamela R.Haunschild,Chfistine M. Beckman. When Do Interlocks Matter:Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, (43).
5Peter C. Dooley. The Interlocking Directorate[J]. The American Economics Review,1969, (59).
6Phillip H. Phan,Soo Hoon Lee,Siang Chi Lau. The Performance Impact of Interlocking Directorates:The Caseof Singapore[J]. Journal of Management Issue,2003, (3).
7Ronald S. Burt. Cooptive Corporate Actor Network:A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, (25).
8Thomas Koenig,Robcrt Gogel,and Sonquist. Models of Significance of Interlocking Corporate Directorates[J].American Journal of Economics and Sociology,1979,(38).
9Thomas Koenig & Robert Gogel. Interlocking Corporate Directorships as a Social Network [J]. American Journal of Economics and Sociology,January,1981,(40).
10A. G. Davison,Bruce W. Stening & Wan Tai-wai. Auditor Concentration and the Impact of Interlocking Directorates[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1984, (1).