期刊文献+

家蚕RAPD、AFLP和SSR标记的研究及比较分析 被引量:9

Comparison of SSR, AFLP and RAPD Markers for Genetic Analysis of Domestic Silkworm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨RAPD、AFLP和SSR标记系统在家蚕遗传学研究中各自适用领域,为其在种质资源研究中选择适合的分子标记系统提供参考。【方法】利用RAPD、AFLP和SSR3种分子标记方法研究了15个家蚕品种的遗传多样性指数,同时对3种标记系统进行了比较分析。【结果】SSR标记位点的期望异质性(He)最大(0.40),AFLP标记位点的He最小(0.25),但AFLP有最高标记指数(MI,15.60)和最高的多态性检测效率(Ai,74.75)。【结论】SSR比AFLP和RAPD的信息含量高,使得它最适合用于种质资源的遗传多样性分析;AFLP的检测效率高即能够在1次PCR扩增反应中检测到最多的DNA带型,非常适合于种质鉴定与保护和构建连锁遗传图谱。 【Objective】It can provide a reference for selecting appropriate marker system for germplasm resource research through studies of its respective suitable domain of RAPD, AFLP and SSR marker systems in domestic silkworm (Bombyx mori) genetics research. 【Method】 RAPD, AFLP and SSR were used to study the genetic diversity index of 15 B.mori strains. And the three marker systems were compared. 【Result】 The results indicated that SSR presented the highest expected heterozygosity (0.40). While the lowest values of expected heterozygosity were obtained from AFLPs, which nevertheless obtained the highest marker index (MI, 15.60) and value of assay efficiency (Ai, 74.75). 【Conclusion】SSRs had higher information content than RAPD and AFLP, so it is adapted to genetic analysis of germplasm. AFLP had higher assay efficiency, i.e. it can generate more DNA bands in single PCR amplification. It is suitable for identification and protection of germplasm and construction of genetic linkage map.
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第12期2926-2930,共5页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 教育部博士点专项基金(20040625009) 国家自然科学基金(30170719) 西华师范大学科研启动基金(05B33)
关键词 家蚕 SSR AFLP RAPD 遗传分析 Bombyx mori SSR AFLP RAPD Genetic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]Welsh J,McClelland M.Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitary primers.Nucleic Acids Research,1990,18:7213-7218.
  • 2[2]Vos P,Hogers R,Bleeker M,Reijans M,van de Lee T,Homes M,Frijters A,Pot J,Peleman J,Kuiper M.AFLP a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.Nucleic Acids Research,1995,23(21):4407-4414.
  • 3[3]Tautz D.Hypervariability of simple sequence as general source for polymorphic DNA markers.Nucleic Acids Research,1989,17(16):6463-6471.
  • 4[4]Reddy D K,Abraham E G,Nagaraju J.Microsatellites in the silkworm,Bombyx mori:Abundance,polymorphism and strain characterization.Genome,1999,42(6):1057-1065.
  • 5[5]Powell W,Mogante M,Andre C,Hanafey M,Vogel J,Tingey S,Rafalski A,The comparison of RFLP,RAPD,AFLP and SSR (microsatellite)markers for germplasm analysis.Molecular Breeding,1996.2:225-238.
  • 6[6]Belaj A,Satovic Z,Cipriani G,Baldoni L,Testolin R,Rallo L,Trujillo I.Comparative study of the discriminating capacity of RAPD,AFLP and SSR markers and of their effectiveness in establishing genetic relationships in olive.Theoretical and Applied Genetics,2003,107(4):736-744.
  • 7[7]Xu F X,Sun M.Comparative analysis of phylogenetic relationships of grain amaranths and their wild relatives(Amaranthus;Amaranthaceae)using internal transcribed spacer,Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism,and double-primer fluorescent Intersimple Sequence Repeat markers.Molecular ehylogenetics and Evolution,2001,21(3):372-387.
  • 8[8]Talhinhas P.Neves.Martins J,Leitao J.AFLP,ISSR and RAPD markers reveal high levels of genetic diversity among Lupinus spp.Plant Breeding,2003,122(6):507-510.
  • 9[9]Pejic I,Ajmone-Marsan P,Morgante M,Kozumplick V.Castiglioni P,Taramino G,Motto M.Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs,RAPDs,SSRs,and AFLPs.Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1998,97:1248-1255.
  • 10[11]Nagaraju J,Reddy K D,Nagaraja G M,Sethuraman B N.Comparison of multilocus RFLPs and PCR-based marker systems for genetic analysis of the silkworm,Bombyx mori.Heredity,2001,86(Pt 5):588-597.

同被引文献177

引证文献9

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部