期刊文献+

可推知回指与定指认知语用推理

Cognitive-Pragmatic Inference of Definiteness -Based Inferable Anaphora
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在前人研究的基础上界定有定性可推知回指及特点,归纳回指标示语的三大句法形式及六种语义关系。并且详细分析了已知信息等级与有定回指标示的必然密切对应关系。由于有定性可推知回指具有刘礼进提出的已知信息和Chafe的可识信息所提供的认知理据,又有Grice的“适量准则”和Levinson的“信息原则”所提供的语用理据,因此本文拟分析可推知回指与定指的认知语用解释机制,旨在更深刻地理解可推知回指现象,从而正确地解读其隐含的语义信息。 On the basis of the previous findings on relevant topics, the paper defines the definite IA and categorizes it into three main syntactic forms and six semantic relations, and explores the inevitable and close correspondence between THE -NP and the phenomenon of definite inferable reference. Since the phenomenon of DIA is actually guided by Liu Lijin's cognitive mode and Grice and Levinson's pragmatic principles, the author tries to work out the cognitive pragmatic inferential mechanisms of DIA. It is hoped that the present study will facilitate a better understanding of the mechanism involved in THE-NPs and thus enable correct decoding of implicit messages in text.
作者 徐立红
出处 《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第5期38-41,共4页 Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 可推知回指 有定性 已知信息等级 场景 认知语用分析 inferable anaphora, definiteness, given information,scenario,cognition and pragmatics
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]Ariel, M. Accessing Noun - phrase Antecedents[M]. London: Routledge 1990.
  • 2[2]Chafe. W. Givenness, Consciousness, Definiteness, Subject, Topics, and Point of View [A]. In Ch. N.Li (ed). Subject and Topics[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
  • 3[3]Duboise. et al. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English- Part [R ] Linguistic Data Consirtium,2000.
  • 4[4]Garrod, S.C. and A. J. Sanford. The mental representation of discourse in a focussed memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases.Journal of Semantics 1982(1): 21-41.
  • 5[5]Gundel, J.K. , N. Hedberg & R. Zacharski. Cognitive status and the form of referring expression in discourse [J]. Language 1993.
  • 6[6]Matsui, Tomoko. Assessing A Scenarion - based Account of Bridging Reference Assignment [A]. 1998.
  • 7[7]Prince, E. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information [A]. In Cole P. (ed). Radical Pragmatics[C].New York Academic press, 1981
  • 8[8]Sperber,D. &D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[M] Oxford :Blackwell, 1986
  • 9[9]Xu, Yulong. Resolving Third - Person Anaphorain Chinese Texts: Towards a Functional-Pragmatic Model[D]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University,1995.
  • 10项成东.间接照应及其认知推理[J].西安外国语学院学报,2004,12(2):5-9. 被引量:20

二级参考文献74

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部