4Gamboa F, Fernandez G, Padilla E, Manterola JM, Lonca J, Cardona PJ, Matas L, Ausina V. Comparative evaluation of initial and new versions of the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1998,36(3): 684--689.
5O'Sullivan CE, Miller DRPS, Schneider PS, Roberts GD. Evaluation of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test by using respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens in a tertiary care center laboratory[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2002,40 (5) : 1723--1727.
6Piersimoni C, Callegaro A, Scarparo C, Penati V, Nista D, Bornigia S, Lacchini C, Scagnelli M, Santini G, De Sio G. Comparative evaluation of the new Gen-Probe Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Amplified Direct Test and the semiautornated Abbott LCx Mycobacteriurn tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobae. terium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1998,36(12): 3601--3604.
7Pounder JI, Aldous WK, Woods GL. Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction using the Smart Cycler and the Gen- Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of M. tuberculosis complex in clinical specimens[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2006,54(3): 217--222.
8Stirtictioglu, S, Ozktitok N, Gazi H, Celik P. Assessment of performance of " amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test" in pulmonary and extra pulmonary specimens [J]. Mikrobiyol Bu, 2007, 41(3): 377--84.
9Coll P, Garrigo M, Moreno C, marti N. Routine use of Genprobe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) Test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with smear-positive and smear-negative specimens[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2003,7(9) :886--891.
10Vlaspolder F, Singer P, Roggeveen C. Diagnostic value of an amplification method (Gen-Probe) compared with that of culture for diagnosis of tuberculosis[J].J Clin Microbiol, 1995. 33(10) : 2699--2703.
