摘要
以严厉而著称的美国反托拉斯法，经过一百多年的发展演变，已经形成了比较完备的体系，其中许多重要的原则和制度都是通过不同时期的判例确立的。这些判例是根据成文法的原则规定结合具体案件的实际情况做出的，不仅丰富了成文法的规定，并成为其后来运用的基础，同时也记载着美国适用反托拉斯法的历史演变过程，在一定意义上引导着美国反托拉斯法的未来发展。
Having developed for more than 100 years, America n anti-trust law, famous for its sternness, has formed a relatively perfect system, in which many important principles and systems have been set up through the cases of different periods. These cases, which have been made according to the principle regulations of positive law combined with the facts of concrete cases, not only enriched the regulations of positive law, but made themselves the bases of later employment. These cases also record the historical development period of America's applying to the anti-trust law and in some means conduct the future development of American anti-trust law.
出处
《河北法学》
2001年第5期131-133,共3页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
反托拉斯法
判例
成文法
垄断
合理原则
本身违法
结构主义
行为主义
anti-trust law
case
positive law
monopolize
principle of reasonableness
itself breaks the law
structurism
behaviorism
