期刊文献+

吉西他滨为基础的三种不同化疗方案治疗126例晚期NSCLC疗效观察 被引量:5

Gemcitabine-based combination regimen for treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨以吉西他滨为主联合化疗一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效、疾病进展期(TTP)、生存期及毒副作用.方法126例经组织学或细胞学确诊的未曾治疗的晚期NSCLC,非随机接受GP/4周组(27例)、GP/3周组(65例)、GN组(34例).结果全组有效率(RR)35.7%(CR 1例,PR 45例),1年生存率35.6%(95%CI:CI.05~45.18),中位生存期(MST)10个月(95%CI:8~12),MTTP3.89个月(95%CI:3.67~7.30).GP/4周组RR 40.7%(CR 1例,RR 11例),一年生存率37.0%(95%CI:18.83~55.32),MST 8个月(95%CI:5~11),MTTP5.05个月(95%CI:3.48~8.95),中位缓解期(MRT)8.26个月(95%CI:8.13~20.32).GP/3周组RR为32.3%(PR:21例).1年生存率35.9%(95%CI:21.46~50.38),MST10个月(95%CI:8~12),MTTP 3.40个月(95%CI:2.73~4.02),MRT 1.51个月(95%CI:1.22~14.73).GN组RR38.2%(PR 13例),1年生存率31.0%(95%CI:13.10~48.96),MST 9个月(95%CI:6~12),MTT3.93个月(95%CI:2.02~8.08),MRT 2.16个月(95%CI:1.75~14.27).三组间RR、1年生存率、MS差异无显著性.MTTP GP/4周优于GP/3周组,有显著差异(P<0.05),MRT GP/4周组优于其他两组有显著差异(P<0.05).WHO血液学毒性,Ⅲ/Ⅳ度中性粒细胞下降,GP/4周组为14.29%,GP/3周组为8.38%,GN组为11.34%,3组间差异无显著性.Ⅲ/Ⅳ度贫血GP/4周组10.39%,GP/3周组1.22%,GN组3.96%.GP/4周组明显高于GP/3周组(P<O.05),Ⅲ/Ⅳ度血小板减少GP/4周组26.32%,GP/3周组11.24%,GN组6.25%,GP/4周组明显高于其他两组(P<0.05),非血液学毒性恶心/呕吐GN组明显优于GP/4周及GP/3周组(P<0.05).结论GP/4周、GP/3周及GN显示相似的客观有效率,中位生存期及1年生存率,毒副作用显示GP/3周及GN较轻,为耐受性较好的治疗晚期NSCLC化疗方案. Objective To evaluat and compare effecacy the gemcitabine-based three regimen(GP/4weeks,GP/3weeks,GN) for advanced non-Small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods The 126 cases with non-threatment advance NSCLC were unrandomly divided into three groups,GP/4weeks(27 patients),GP/3weeks(65 patients) and GN(34 patients).Results For GP/4weeks groups,the overall response rate of this group was 40.7%(CR1,PR11),one year survival rate(1-ySR) was 37.0%(95%CI 18.83~55.32),MST was 8 months(95%CI 5~11),MTTP was 5.05 months,MRT was 8.26 months.For GP/3weeks group,there was no CR,PR was 32.3%,1-ySR was 35.9%(95%CI 21.46~50.38),MST was 10 months(95%CI 8~12),MTTP was 3.40 months,MRT was 1.51months.For GN groups,There was no CR,PR was 38.2%,1-ySR was 31.0%(95%CI 13.10~48.96),MST was 9 months(95% CI 6~12),MTTP was 3.93months,MRT 2.16 months.There were no significant difference in response rate,1-ySR and MST for these three groups(P>0.05).MTTP was significantly longer in GP/4weeks group than that in GP/3weeks and GN(P<0.05).MRT was also significantly longer in GP/4weeks group than the other two groups(P<0.05).WHO grade 3/4 neutropenia were similar in three groups(P>0.05).Grade 3/4 anemia occurred in 10.39% in GP/4weeks groups,and grade 3/4 aremia occurred in 1.22% in GP/3weeks groups,it was significantly highter in GP/4weeks groups than these in GP/3weeks groups(P<0.05).The grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occured was also significantly higher in GP/4weeks(26.32%) than these in the other two groups(P<0.05).Nausea/vomiting of GN groups was significantly mild than the other groups(P<0.05).Conclusion There were no significant difference in the response rates,1-ySR,MST for the three groups.Toxicities were tolerable in GP/3week groups and GN,there fo GP/3week and GN might be better chemotherapeutic regiment for advanced NSCLC.
出处 《癌症进展》 2005年第6期596-601,共6页 Oncology Progress
关键词 晚期非小细胞肺癌 吉西他滨 顺铂 长春瑞滨 NSCLC gemcitabine cisplatin vinorelbine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]By L, Crino G. Scagliotti, M. Marangolo, et al. Cisplatin gemcitabine combination in advanced non-small cell lung cancer:A phase Ⅱ study. J Clin Oncol 1997, 15 (1):297
  • 2[2]Roy S. Herbst, Cathleen Lynch, Michael Vasconcelles, et al.Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with advanced lung cancer: Preclinical studies and report of a phase Ⅰ trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2001, 48: 151
  • 3[3]C Granetto, G Numico, et al. Gemcitabine and cisptatin 21 in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A fesible schedule with optimal dose Ⅰntensity (abstract2141). Proc ASCO, 2000, 19:543A
  • 4刘叙仪,方健,王洁,吴梅娜,安彤同,张湘茹,李岭.吉西他滨联合长春瑞滨一线治疗40例晚期非小细胞肺癌[J].中国癌症杂志,2002,12(4):347-349. 被引量:4
  • 5[5]Rafael Rosell, Mauizio Tonato, Alan Sandler. The Activity of Gemcitabine plus cisplatin in randomiazed trials in untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Seminars in Oncology, 1998, 25 (4Suppl 9):27

二级参考文献5

  • 1[1]Shephered FA. Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer have we reached a new plateau[J].Semin Oncol,1999,26(Suppl 4):3-11.
  • 2[2]Schiller JH,. Harrington D, Sandler AB, et al. A randomized phase Ⅲ tria l of four chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[ J]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2000,19(2):1a.
  • 3[3]Storniolo AM, Allerherligen SR, Pearee HL. Preclinical pharmacology and p hase I studies of gemcitabine[J].Semin Oncol,1997,24(Suppl 7): 572-577.
  • 4[4]Binet S, Fellous A, Lataste H, et al. In suite analysis of the action of Navelbine on vasious types of microbules using immunofluoreseence [J].Semin On col,1998,16(Suppl 4):5-8.
  • 5[5]Palmeri S, Leomardi V, Gebbia V, et al. Gemcitabine plus with vinorelbine in stage Ⅲb or Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC):a multicentre phase Ⅱ cl inical trail[J].Lung Cancer,2001,34(1):115-123.

共引文献3

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部