期刊文献+

个性指数问卷的信度和效度研究 被引量:3

A study of the reliability and validity of the Personality indicators
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价个性指数问卷(Personality indicators)的信度和效度。方法 由专业医生对36例心理咨询门诊者评定个性指数问卷和艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)。对量表的内部一致性、分半相关及平行效度进行分析。结果 个性指数问卷各维度的Cronbach's α系数在0.7181~0.8317之间,分半相关系数为0.6443和0.6181。个性指数问卷的5种维度倾向分别与EVQ的相应个性维度具有显著性相关。结论 个性指数问卷操作简便,具有较好的信度和效度。 Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Personality indicators. Methods: 36 consultants were rated with Personality indicators and EPQ by trained doctors. The inter-item and half-split consistency and parallel validity of Personality indicators were analyzed respectively. Results: The coefficient of inter-item consistency ( Cronbach's αcoefficient) of all dimensions of Personality indicators were between 0.7181 and 0. 8317, and the coefficients of half-split consistency were 0. 6443 and 0. 6181, respectively. All five dimensions of Personality indicators were significantly relative with corresponding dimensions of EPQ. Conclusion: The results indicated that the Chinese version of Personality indicators have relatively good reliability and validity.
出处 《上海精神医学》 北大核心 2003年第z1期39-41,共3页 Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry
基金 国家自然科学基金(No:30170327) 2001年度上海联合利华研究与发展基金(No:145)
关键词 个性指数问卷 量表 信度 效度 Personality indicators Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[1]Garfein A J, Herzog AR. Robust aging among the young-old, old-old,and oldest-old. Journal of Geronology: Social Sciences, 1995, 50B(2) : 77 ~87
  • 2[2]Rodin J, McAvay G. Determinants of change in perceived health in a longitudinal study of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 1992, 47(6) : 373 ~384

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部