摘要
刑法第277条前三款规定的妨害公务罪不存在犯罪停止形态,此种观点的错误在于混淆了犯罪的停止形态与犯罪的完成形态两概念之间的区别;多数学者认为,刑法第277条规定的妨害公务罪是存在未遂形态的,但笔者认为,无论是刑法第277条前三款规定的妨害公务罪,还是刑法第277条第4款规定的妨害公务罪均不存在未遂形态,都是只有既遂形态。
There no exist criminal cessation pattern in Article 277th of Criminal Law preceding three clause prescribed crime of disrupting public service,but the mistakes of viewpoints is confuse distinction between criminal cessation pattern and criminal completeness pattern.Plurality of scholar think that there exist pattern of attempt in Article 277th of Criminal Law prescribed crime of disrupting public service,but the wirter think that Article 277th of Criminal Law preceding three clause or Article 277th of Crim...
出处
《白城师范学院学报》
2004年第2期4-6,共3页
Journal of Baicheng Normal University
关键词
妨害公务罪
犯罪停止形态
未遂形态
crime of disrupting public service
criminal cessation pattern
pattern of attempt
