期刊文献+

Informational uncertainties of risk assessment about accidents of chemicals 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 An analysis system of informational uncertainties for accidental risk assessment of chemicals is introduced. Statistical test methods and fuzzy sets method can do the quantitative analysis of the input parameters. The uncerainties of the model can be used by quantitative compared method for the leakage accidents of chemicals. The estimation of the leaking time is important for discussing accidental source term. The uncertain analyses of the release accident for pipeline gas (CO) liquid chlorine and liquid propane gas (LPG) have been discussed. An analysis system of informational uncertainties for accidental risk assessment of chemicals is introduced. Statistical test methods and fuzzy sets method can do the quantitative analysis of the input parameters. The uncerainties of the model can be used by quantitative compared method for the leakage accidents of chemicals. The estimation of the leaking time is important for discussing accidental source term. The uncertain analyses of the release accident for pipeline gas (CO) liquid chlorine and liquid propane gas (LPG) have been discussed.
作者 ZHANG Yi-xian
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2001年第1期69-74,共6页 环境科学学报(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1OECD.Environmentmonographs,riskassessmentandriskmanagementforaccidentsconnectedwithindustrialactivities. . 1 989
  • 2QuantifiedAP,JohnJF.Environmentalmethodreview :retoolingimpactassessmentfornewcentury. . 1 998
  • 3QuelchJ,CameronIT. JLossPrevInd . 1 994
  • 4ThomasEMcKenna,KennethTB. EnvironSciTechno . 1 991
  • 5.WHSZAN ⅡUserManual 1 993 AppendixVI modelingtheory Version 2 .1[].May.1993

同被引文献8

  • 1张一先,董雪芳,王建平,杨海,张宇.LPG泄漏爆炸事故分析中参数不确定性的处理方法[J].苏州科技学院学报(工程技术版),2005,18(2):64-68. 被引量:2
  • 2[1]Quantified A P,John J F.Environmental method review:retooling impact assessment for new century[M].North Dako:Farge,1998.
  • 3[3]Paula A I.Evaluation of uncertainty in a site-specific risk assessment[J].J Environ Eng,1997,3:234-242.
  • 4[4]Thompson H.Monte-carlo techniques for quantitative uncertainty analysis in public health risk assessment[J].Risk anal,1992,12(1):53-63.
  • 5Quantified A P, John J F. Environmental method review: retooling impact assessment for new century[M]. North Dako: Farge, 1998.
  • 6Paula A I. Evaluation of uncertainty in a site-specific risk assessment[J]. J Environ Eng, 1997,3:234-242.
  • 7Thompson H. Monte-carlo techniques for quantitative uncertainty analysis in public health risk assessment[J]. Risk anal, 1992,12( 1 ):53-63.
  • 8傅玉梅,谢敏.液化石油气储配站风险评价[J].化工矿物与加工,1999,28(5):20-23. 被引量:8

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部