期刊文献+

冠状动脉内与静脉内应用替罗非班对血小板聚集率的影响 被引量:2

Effects of intracoronary and intravenous application of tirofiban on platelet aggregation rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较冠状动脉内与静脉应用替罗非班对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者冠状动脉和静脉内血小板聚集率(PAR)的影响。方法 18例拟行经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)治疗的ACS患者随机分为替罗非班冠状动脉内应用组(IC组,n=9)和替罗非班静脉内应用组(IV组,n=9)。分析给药后不同时间点PAR在组内的变化及PAR降低幅度在组间的差异,记录两组患者出血事件和血小板减少症的发生情况。结果两组患者给药后PAR均得到抑制,与给药前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在冠状动脉血样中,IC组较IV组的PAR降低趋势更明显(P=0.062);在外周静脉血样中,两组PAR的降低幅度相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者出血事件和血小板减少症的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论冠状动脉内或静脉内应用替罗非班均能快速有效地降低冠状动脉局部及静脉内的PAR,且不增加出血风险。 Objective To investigate the effects of intracoronary and intravenous application of tirofiban on platelet aggregation rate(PAR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Methods Eighteen patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) were randomized into intracoronary tirofiban bolus group(group IC,n=9) and intravenous tirofiban bolus group(group IV,n=9).The changes of PAR at different time points after tirofiban application in two groups and the differences in the degree of PAR decrease between two groups were analysed,and the prevalences of bleeding and thrombocytopenia were also recorded. Results PAR decreased after treatment with tirofiban in both groups,and there were significant differences between PAR after treatment and that before treatment(P<0.05).In coronary artery,the trend of PAR decrease in group IC was more significant than that in group IV(P=0.062).In peripheral vessel,there was no significant difference in the degree of PAR decrease between two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the prevalences of bleeding and thrombocytopenia between two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Both intracoronary and intravenous application of tirofiban can effectively decrease PAR in coronary artery and peripheral vessel,and may not increase the risk of bleeding.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期299-301,共3页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
关键词 急性冠状动脉综合征 经皮冠状动脉介入术 替罗非班 血小板聚集 冠状动脉内 静脉 acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention tirofiban platelet aggregation intracoronary intravenous
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,徐立,葛永贵,王红石,李惟铭,倪祝华,夏昆,连勇,薛永利,马利祥.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):517-522. 被引量:73
  • 2Acar G,Skmen G,Nacar AB,et al.Efficient tirofiban infusionresulting in resolution of intracoronary thrombus. Turk KardiyolDern Ars . 2008
  • 3Erden I,Ozhan H,Ordu S.A case of acute stent thrombosis treatedsuccessfully with intracoronary tirofiban. Kardiologia Polska . 2010
  • 4Wu TG,Zhao Q,Huang WG,et al.Effect of intracoronary tirofibanin patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acutecoronary syndrome. Circulation Journal . 2008
  • 5Erdim R,Erciyes D,Grmez S,et al.Comparison of intracoronaryversus intravenous administration of tirofiban in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi . 2010
  • 6Yang TY,Chang ST,Chung CM,et al.Restoration of normalcoronary flow with tirofiban by intracoronary administration forno-reflow phenomenon after stent deployment. Int Heart J . 2005

二级参考文献22

  • 1Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burehenal JE, et al. Randomized, placebocontrolled trial of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa blockade with primary PTCA Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT). Circulation, 1998, 98 (8) : 734-741.
  • 2Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, et al. For the ADMIRAL Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med, 2001, 344 ( 25 ) : 1895-1903.
  • 3Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Comparision of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acuete myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med, 2002, 346(13): 957-966.
  • 4Neuman FJ, Kastrati A, Schmitt C, et al. Effect of glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor blockade with abciximab on clinical and angiographic restenosis rate after of coronary stents following acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardial, 2000,35(4) :915-921.
  • 5Platelet receptor inhibition in ischemic syndrome management (PRISM) study investigators. A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. N Engl J Med, 1998,338(21) : 1498-1505.
  • 6Platelet receptor inhibition in ischemic syndrome management in patients limited by unstable sign and symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) study investigators. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med, 1998,338 (21) : 1488- 1497.
  • 7The RESTORE Investigators. Effects ,of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Circulation, 1997, 96(5) : 1445-1453.
  • 8Uyarel H, Uzunlar B, Unal Dayi S, et al. Effect of Tirofiban Therapy on ST Segment Resolution and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ST Segment Elevated Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty. Cardiology,2006,105 (3) : 168- 175.
  • 9Martinez-Rios MA, Rosas M, Gonzalez H, et al. Comparison of reperfusion regimens with or without tirofiban in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol,2004, 93 (3) :280-287.
  • 10Yip HK, Wu CJ, Chang HW, et al. Impact of tirofiban on angiographic morphologic features of high-burden thrombus formation during direct percutaneous coronary intervention and short-term outcomes. Chest, 2003,124(3 ) :962-968.

共引文献72

同被引文献31

  • 1杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,徐立,葛永贵,王红石,李惟铭,倪祝华,夏昆,连勇,薛永利,马利祥.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):517-522. 被引量:73
  • 2Konopka A, Spychalska J, Piotrowski W, et al. Influence of some cardiovascular risk factors on the expression of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptors. Mol Diagn Ther, 2009, 13: 375-382.
  • 3Go YL, Kampinga MA, Wieringa WG, et al. Intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation, 2010, 21: 2709-2717.
  • 4Iversen A, Abildgaard U, Galloe A, et al. lntracoronary compared to intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI. J Interv Cardiol, 2011, 24:105-111.
  • 5Thiele H, Schindler K, Friedenberger J, et al. Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application in patients with STEMI. Circulation, 2008, 7: 49-57.
  • 6Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Abreu-Gonzalez P, Avanzas P, et al. Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration in palients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis, 2009, 10: 523-527.
  • 7Yang XC, Zhang DP, Wang LF, et al. Effects of intracoronary or intravenous tirofiban administration in patients with STEMI. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi, 2007, 35: 517-522.
  • 8Bellandi F, Maioli M, Gallopin M, et al. Increase of myocardial salvage and left ventricular function recovery with intracoronary abciximah downstream of the coronary occlusion in patients with STEMI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2004, 6:186-192.
  • 9Eitel I, Friedenberger J, Fuernau G, et al. ntracornnary versus intravenous bolus abciximab application in patients with STEMI. Clin Res Cardinl, 2011, 5: 425-432.
  • 10Van't Hof AW, Ten Berg J, Heestermans T. Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty (On- TIME 2). Lancet, 2008, 16: 537-546.

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部