摘要
近几年来,犯罪构成理论逐渐成为我国刑法学界争论的重点。学者们围绕着应对我国传统四要件的犯罪构成理论进行改革,还是应彻底改换为大陆法系三阶层式的犯罪构成理论这一关键问题,展开了空前激烈的争论。在这种情况下,有必要对这两种理论进行细致地论述和比较,以确定我国的犯罪构成理论,到底是应走改革之路,还是走改换之路,才会更为合适和高效。同时,更有必要探究的是应如何对我国的犯罪构成理论进行改革或改换。
In recent years,the theory of constitution of crime has gradually become the focus of controversy in the field of criminal law of our country.The scholars have launched an unprecedented heated debate on the key issue that whether we should reform our traditional four-element theory of constitution of crime or change into the three-hierarchy theory of crime,which is used in the civil law system.So in this case,it is necessary to discuss and compare the two theories in details to determine which road we should take,reform or change,would be more appropriate and efficient.At the same time,it is more necessary to explore how to reform or change the theory of constitution of crime of our country.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2011年第5期131-134,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
犯罪构成
四要件理论
三阶层理论
constitution of crime
four-element theory of constitution of crime
three-hierarchy theory of crime
