摘要
随着国家公共服务职能日益扩展,单纯适用《民法通则》第126条规定的建筑物责任条款解决公共设施致害纠纷的弊端日益为学界所诟病。从公私法二元对立并不断走向融合的关系看,未来我国公共设施致害责任的立法取向应当包括以下两个方面:其一,设置和管理公共设施是政府的重要职责,由此给公民、法人或其他组织造成损害的,国家有义务承担相应的赔偿责任;其二,民事赔偿和国家赔偿之间并非对立冲突、非此即彼的关系,而是可以共生共存、优势互补的,应赋予受害人对民事赔偿或国家赔偿的选择权。
With the extension of the government's public service function,the defects are denounced by academe that are brought by just applied Article 126 of General Civil Law,which stipulates the responsibility for damages caused by buildings,to solve disputes caused by public facilities.From the perspective of the relationship between private and public laws,which are binary opposite and experiencing a process of mergence at the same time,the legislative orientation on the liability for damages caused by public facilities in the future should include two aspects: on the one hand,the settlement and management of public facilities are responsibilities of governments,so they should take responsibility to compensate citizens,legal entities or other organizations for damages which caused by public facilities;on the other hand,the relationship between the civil compensation liability and the state compensation liability is not either this or that,but coexistent and mutually complemented.The law should authorize victims to choose between civil compensation and state compensation.
出处
《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第2期61-66,共6页
Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
教育部人文社科重点研究项目(08JJD820182)
关键词
公共设施
公私法
公法
私法
国家赔偿
民事赔偿
public facilities
public private law
public law
private law
national compensation
civil compensation
