期刊文献+

婆媳冲突中有意不礼貌语言现象的语用分析 被引量:12

A Pragmatic Study of Intentional Impoliteness in the Conflict between a Mother-in-law and her Daughter-in-law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文按说话者用意把有意不礼貌的实现方式分为五类:质疑、驳斥、批评、詈骂和警告;并依据Verschueren的语言顺应论,指出有意不礼貌是交际者顺应语境因素,包括交际动机如维护身份地位与面子,宣泄负面情绪的情感需求,及双方平等但具有竞争性的关系等因素,为实现交际意图而采取的一项交际策略。本研究旨在揭示有意不礼貌语言现象的语境顺应性特征和语用理据。 The linguistic phenomenon of impoliteness is universal in human interaction;however,it is neglected by researchers due to its inharmonious nature.The present study classifies the realization of intentional impoliteness into five main categories based on the speaker’s intention: challenge,contradiction,criticism,swearing and warning.According to Verschueren(1999),intentional impoliteness is a communicative strategy employed by the speaker in adapting to contextual correlates,so as to fulfill his/her communicative intentions.
作者 赖小玉
机构地区 广东工业大学
出处 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2012年第2期37-41,共5页 Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
基金 国家社科基金项目"英汉语中冲突性话语的构建模式及其制约机制的语用分析"(09BYY070) 广东工业大学博士启动基金项目"言语冲突现象的语用研究"(113019)的研究成果
关键词 有意不礼貌 交际策略 语境顺应性 intentional impoliteness communicative strategy contextual adaptability
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Brown,P,Levinson,S. Politeness:some universals in language usage[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1978.
  • 2Leech,G. Principles ofPragmatics[M].New York:Longman Group Limited,1983.
  • 3李元胜.汉语中不礼貌言语行为的顺应性研究[J].现代语文(下旬.语言研究),2006(11):48-50. 被引量:41
  • 4Culpeper,J,Bousfield,D,Wichmann,A. Impoliteness revisited:with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2003,(10-11):1545-1579.
  • 5Bousfield D. Impoliteness in Interaction[M].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2008.
  • 6He,M,Zhang,S. Re-conceptualizing the Chinese concept of face from a face-sensitive perspective:a case study of a modern Chinese TV drama[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2011,(10):2360-2372.
  • 7Han Chung-hey. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions[J].Lingua,2002,(03):201-229.
  • 8Muntigl,P,Turnbull,W. Conversational structure and facework in arguing[J].Journal of Pragmatics,1998,(03):225-256.
  • 9冉永平.冲突性话语趋异取向的语用分析[J].现代外语,2010,33(2):150-157. 被引量:166
  • 10Gamble,T,Gamble,M. Contacts:Interpersonal Communication in Theory,Practice,and Context[M].New York:Houghton Mifflin,2005.

二级参考文献29

  • 1赵英玲.冲突话语分析[J].外语学刊,2004(5):37-42. 被引量:173
  • 2丁崇明.论词语叠连式不礼貌语言[J].语言文字应用,2001(3):64-69. 被引量:28
  • 3万斌,王满荣.论冲突与和谐[J].求索,2006(8):59-62. 被引量:12
  • 4Boggs, S. T. 1978. The development of verbal disputing in part-Hawaiian children [J]. Language in Society 7: 325-344.
  • 5Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 6Boxer, D. 2002. Nagging: The familial conflict arena [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 49-61.
  • 7Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Eisenberg, A. & C. Garvey. 1981. Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts [J]. Discourse Processes 4: 149-170.
  • 9Farris, C. S. P. 2000. Cross-sex peer conflict and the discoursive production of gender in a Chinese preschool in Taiwan [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 32 : 539-568.
  • 10Giles, H. & P. Powesland. 1997. Accommodation theory [A]. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (eds.). Sociolinguistics : A Reader and Coursebook [C]. London: The Macmillan Press, 232-239.

共引文献201

同被引文献118

引证文献12

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部