期刊文献+

甲状腺结节超声诊断价值的探讨及最佳量化评分点的探寻 被引量:28

Clinical value and optimal diagnostic point of ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨常规灰阶超声和超声造影联合诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值,探寻评分法诊断甲状腺结节的最佳量化评分点。方法回顾性分析经手术病理证实的178个甲状腺结节的超声表现,对常规灰阶超声显示的结节形状、生长方向、内部回声、周边暗环和微钙化5项指标和超声造影显示的结节周边及内部开始增强时间、结节周边及内部峰值强度、环状增强和增强均一度6项指标进行评分,每个指标阳性记为1分、阴性记为0分。分别绘制常规灰阶超声、超声造影及两者联合评分的受试者操作特点(ROC)曲线,获得三者诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的最佳量化评分点并评估其诊断价值。结果甲状腺良恶性结节的常规灰阶超声评分、超声造影评分、联合评分间差异均有统计学意义(Z=10.188、9.843、10.705,P均<0.001)。常规灰阶超声、超声造影及两者联合评分的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.936、0.919、0.964。甲状腺结节常规灰阶超声5项指标中3项或以上阳性提示恶性,敏感度和特异度分别为79.6%和91.2%;超声造影6项指标中2项或以上阳性提示恶性,敏感度和特异度分别为91.8%和81.2%;常规灰阶超声和超声造影11项指标中5项或以上阳性提示恶性,敏感度和特异度分别为93.6%和92.3%。结论常规灰阶超声和超声造影有助于甲状腺良恶性结节的鉴别诊断,两者联合使用时诊断价值最高,评分法诊断甲状腺结节的最佳量化评分点为5分。 Objective To discuss the combined value of gray-scale ultrasound(GSUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid lesions and to explore the optimal diagnostic point of scoring method.Methods Ultrasound images of 178 thyroid lesions confirmed by pathology were synthetically reviewed by scoring 5 GSUS indicators including shape,orientation,interior echogenicity,halo sign,microcalcification and 6 CEUS indicators including relative arrival time of microbubbles in the periphery and interior,peak periphery and interior echogenicity,peripheral ring-enhancement,and homogeneity of enhancement.One positive indicator scored one point.The optimal diagnostic points and their clinical value were explored according to ROC curves.Results Scores of GSUS,CEUS and the combination of GSUS and CEUS were significantly different(Z =10.188,9.843,10.705,all P <0.001).Areas under ROC curves of GSUS,CEUS and the combination of GSUS and CEUS were 0.936,0.919 and 0.964,respectively.Three or more positive GSUS indicators of five in a thyroid lesion predicted that the thyroid lesion was malignant,with the sensitivity of 79.6% and the specificity of 91.2%.Two or more positive CEUS indicators of six in a thyroid lesion predicted that the thyroid lesion was malignant,with the sensitivity of 91.8% and the specificity of 81.2%.Five or more positive GSUS and CEUS indicators of eleven in a thyroid lesion predicted that the thyroid lesion was malignant,with the sensitivity of 93.6% and the specificity of 92.3%.The areas under the ROC curve of GSUS and CEUS were 0.936 and 0.919.The area under the ROC curve of the combination of GSUS and CEUS was 0.964,larger than the areas under the GSUS ROC curve and the CEUS ROC curve.Conclusion Ultrasound is valuable in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid lesions,and the combination of GSUS and CEUS is the most valuable with 5 points as the optimal diagnostic scoring method.
出处 《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》 2013年第6期489-493,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound(Electronic Edition)
基金 卫生公益性行业科研专项经费项目(200802-10) 上海市重点学科建设项目(B112)
关键词 超声检查 造影剂 甲状腺结节 诊断 鉴别 Ultrasonography Contrast media Thyroid nodule Diagnosis,differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Polyzos SA,Kita M,Avramidis A. Thyroid nodules-stepwise diagnosis and management[J].Hormones(Athens),2007,(02):101-119.
  • 2徐本华,丁红,王文平,俞清,范培丽,夏罕生.甲状腺实性结节的实时超声造影表现和特征[J].中国超声医学杂志,2010,26(8):695-698. 被引量:48
  • 3Kim DW,Jung SJ,Eom JW. Color Doppler features of solid,round,isoechoic thyroid nodules without malignant sonographic feature:a prospective cytopathological study[J].{H}THYROID,2013,(04):472-476.
  • 4American College of Radiology. BI-RADS:mammography.In:Breast imaging reporting and data system:BI-RADS atlas[M].Reston,VA:American College of Radiology,2003.
  • 5Wernecke K,Vassallo P,Bick U. The distinction between benign and malignant liver tumors on sonography:value of a hypoechoic halo[J].{H}AJR American Journal of Roentgenology,1992,(05):1005-1009.
  • 6Takenouchi T,Komori O,Equchi S. An extension of the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC-optimal classification[J].{H}NEURAL COMPUTATION,2012,(10):2789-2824.
  • 7Delellis RA. Tumors of the thyroid and parathyroid[A].Lyon:IARC,2004.49-133.
  • 8Hoang JK,Lee WK,Lee M. US features of thyroid malignancy:pearls and pitfalls[J].{H}RADIOGRAPHICS,2007,(03):847-860.
  • 9Bastin S,Bolland MJ,Croxson MS. Role of ultrasound in the assessment of nodular thyroid disease[J].J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2009,(02):177-187.
  • 10D′Souza MM,Marwaha RK,Sharma R. Prospective evaluation of solitary thyroid nodule on 18F-FDG PET/CT and high-resolution ultrasonography[J].{H}Annals of Nuclear Medicine,2010,(05):345-355.

二级参考文献9

共引文献47

同被引文献272

引证文献28

二级引证文献237

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部