摘要
美国对华商品实施"双反"措施有其一定的WTO法依据,但其国内法依据不足。目前,美国正在通过制定和修改其国内相关成文法和判例法,以弥补该不足。这就要求我们一方面要整理自身的补贴措施和"双反"规则,不授人以柄;另一方面,应积极应诉,防范和抗辩美国利用WTO《反倾销协议》、《SCM协定》等WTO规则语义的模糊性,不充分遵循《中国入世议定书》和《中国入世工作组报告书》的相关规定,从而滥用这些规定等现象;并把这些争端诉诸WTO争端解决机构,力争在国际规则的框架里解决类似争端,以解决目前存在的"双反"规则被滥用的问题,为我国争取一个相对公平的结果。
The'anti-double'measures of U.S.have their legal foundations in WTO law,but the legal foundations are not adequate in its domestic law.At present,the United States is to make up for the shortage,through the enactment and amendment of its statute law and relevant case law.This requires that,on the one hand,we have to improve our own subsidies and'anti-double'rule to avoid giving other country the excuse for revenge;On the other hand,we should actively respond to prevent U.S.from taking the advantage of the ambiguity of WTO'the Agreement of Anti-dumping'and SCM,ignoring Chinese commitments for the entrance into WTO,and abusing the relevant WTO rules.Also,China should resort to WTO dispute settlement body of disputes,to resolve such disputes in the framework of international rules,in order to solve the existing abuse of the'anti-double'rules,for a relatively fair treatment.
出处
《南京大学法律评论》
CSSCI
2009年第2期204-212,共9页
Nanjing University Law Review
