期刊文献+

大学生时间洞察力、自我决定动机与学业拖沓关系探究 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
摘要 学业拖沓在大学生中非常普遍,深入探讨研究拖沓的内在动机和影响因素,并积极寻求解决的办法就显得非常重要。本研究运用问卷法调查了489名大学生的学业拖沓情况,研究发现不同时间洞察力个体可以通过自我决定动机预测学业拖沓,自我决定动机在时间洞察力和学业拖沓之间存在中介作用。每个时间洞察力因子通过动机对学业拖沓的间接作用是不同的,表现出一定特异性。
出处 《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第S4期68-75,共8页 Journal of Capital Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 北京市"发展与教育心理学"重点学科和北京市"学习与认知"重点实验室完成 北京市教育"十一五"规划项目 北京市哲学社会科学"十一五"项目支持 教育部博士点联合基金支持
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3155
  • 2Wills,A,Sandy,M.,Yaeger,A.TimePerspective and Early-Onset Substance Use:A Model Basedon Stress-Coping TheoryPsychology of AddictiveBehaviors,2001.
  • 3Handbook of self-determination research,2003.
  • 4Deci EL,Vallerand RJ,Pelletier LG,Ryan RM.Motivation and education: the self-determination perspectiveEducational Psychologist,1991.
  • 5Solomon LJ,Rothblum E D.Academic procrastination:frequency andcognitive-behavioral correlatesJournal of Counseling and Development,1984.
  • 6Zi mbardo P.G,Boyd,J.N.Putting ti me inperspective:a valid,reliable individual-differences metricJournal of Personality,1999.

二级参考文献22

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7704
  • 2Thompson R J, Kronenberger W G, Johnson D F, Whiting K. The role of central nervous system functioning and family functioning in behavioral problems of children with myelodysplasia. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 1989, 10 : 242 - 248.
  • 3Chang L, Liu H, Wen Z, Fung K, Wang Y, Xu Y. Mediating teacher liking and moderating authoritative teachering on Chinese adolescents' perceptions of antisocial and prosoeial behaviors.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2004, 96 ( 2 ) : 369 - 380.
  • 4Davies P T, Cummings E M. Children's emotions as organizers of their reactions to interadult anger: A functionalist perspective.Developmental Psychology, 1995, 31:677 -684.
  • 5Ireys H T, Werthamer-Larsson, Kolodner K B, Gross S S. Mental health of young adults with chronic iUness: The mediating effect of perceived impact. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 1994, 19 : 205- 222.
  • 6Lazarus R S, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer, 1984. 22-23.
  • 7Thompson R J, Gil K M, Burbach D J, Keith B R, Kinney T R.Role of child and matemal processes in the psychological adjustment of children with sickle cell disease. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1993, 61 : 468 -474.
  • 8Holmbeck G N. Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators : Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1997, 65 : 599 -610.
  • 9James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69 ( 2 ) : 307 - 321.
  • 10Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic,and statistical consideratians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.

共引文献3154

同被引文献87

引证文献8

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部