期刊文献+

The 2008 Irish Dioxin Crisis:Prevention is better than Crisis Management

The 2008 Irish Dioxin Crisis:Prevention is better than Crisis Management
原文传递
导出
摘要 In Ireland, in 2008, pig feed manufactured from recycled human food became contaminated with dioxin and this led to a global recall of all Irish pork products produced from 1st September to 6th December 2008. This case study illustrates several points a) the food chain is only as secure as its weakest link, b) due to the complexity of the modern food chain, once pork is processed, precise traceability to a particular farm of origin is impossible, c) even with a single food agency, overseeing the policing of the food chain, things can go wrong, d) it demonstrated the benefits of having credible consumer protection agencies to undertake scientific risk assessment and communicate with the public, e) if risk management decisions are taken quickly, and communicated in an open and transparent manner to the public, adverse human health effects can be avoided and consumer confidence can maintained, f) in the EU the legal limit for dioxins in pork fat is 1 picogram per gram (10-12 ) and attempting to communicate the risks associated with this level of contamination plus the concepts of bioaccumulation and body burden and the need for continued exposure to result in adverse health effects is extremely challenging, g) there was a major economic impact and damage to the country's reputation as a food exporter and finally h) it illustrates that prevention is better that crisis management. Other countries can learn lessons from this incident that may prevent similar occurrences in their jurisdictions. In Ireland, in 2008, pig feed manufactured from recycled human food became contaminated with dioxin and this led to a global recall of all Irish pork products produced from 1st September to 6th December 2008. This case study illustrates several points a) the food chain is only as secure as its weakest link, b) due to the complexity of the modern food chain, once pork is processed, precise traceability to a particular farm of origin is impossible, c) even with a single food agency, overseeing the policing of the food chain, things can go wrong, d) it demonstrated the benefits of having credible consumer protection agencies to undertake scientific risk assessment and communicate with the public, e) if risk management decisions are taken quickly, and communicated in an open and transparent manner to the public, adverse human health effects can be avoided and consumer confidence can maintained, f) in the EU the legal limit for dioxins in pork fat is 1 picogram per gram (10-12 ) and attempting to communicate the risks associated with this level of contamination plus the concepts of bioaccumulation and body burden and the need for continued exposure to result in adverse health effects is extremely challenging, g) there was a major economic impact and damage to the country’s reputation as a food exporter and finally h) it illustrates that prevention is better that crisis management. Other countries can learn lessons from this incident that may prevent similar occurrences in their jurisdictions.
作者 Patrick Wall
出处 《食品安全质量检测学报》 CAS 2010年第2期55-61,共7页 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
关键词 DIOXIN Crisis management PREVENTION Food Safety Risk Assessment Ireland Dioxin Crisis management Prevention Food Safety Risk Assessment, Ireland
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1OLSSON E K."The Dioxin Scandal"[].Crisis Man-agement in the European Union.2005
  • 2SHEARS P,ZOLLER F,HURD S.Food for thought:What mad cows have wrought with respect to food safe-ty regulation in the EUand UK[].British Food Jour-nal.2001
  • 3Commission of the European Communities.Commission Decision2000/301/ECRepealing the protective measures with regard to contamination by dioxins of certain products of porcine and poultry origin intended for human or animal consumption[2000][].OJL.2000
  • 4BERNARD A,FIERENS S.The Belgian PCB/Dioxin Incident:A Critical Review of Health Risks Evalua-tions[].International Journal of Toxicology.2002
  • 5European Parliament and Council of the European U-nion.EC Regulation No.178/2002of28January2002[].OJL.2002
  • 6European Food Safety Authority.Statement of EFSA on the risks for public health due to the presence of dioxins in pork from Ireland[].EFSA Journal.2008
  • 7van,Larebeke,N,Hens,L,Schepens,P.The Belgian PCB and dioxin incident of January–June 1999: exposure data and potential impact on health[].Environmental Health Perspectives.2001
  • 8Bernard,A,Broeckaert,F,De,Poorter,G,De,Cock,A,Hermans,C,Saegerman,C.The Belgian PCB/Dioxin incident: analysis of the food chain contamination and health risk evaluation[].Environ Res A.2002

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部