摘要
不起诉裁量权是与起诉便宜主义密切相连的、法律特别授予或认可的检察官对于起诉与否的选择权。因而，各国在公诉问题上的基本立场直接影响着立法对检察机关不起诉裁量权的态度。我国立法有关酌定不起诉的规定，赋予了检察机关有限的不起诉裁量权，同时也意味着对起诉便宜主义积极价值的肯认。两大法系在此问题上存在不同作法，自有其不同原因，我国应采取有效措施，补正现行制度的缺陷，推动相关制度的进一步完善。
Non pros Discretion is an option power authorized by the law and exercised by the prosecutor to determine whether to prosecute the suspect or not, relating closely to opportunism principle. Therefore, the basic position of every country on public prosecution directly influences the attitude of the legislation toward Non pros Discretion. Our country's legislation has granted the prosecutor limited Non pros Discretion, meaning the acceptance of the merit of opportunism principle. This article compares the different practice of the two main legal systems on this problem and the ran and tentatively resolves the problems we are facing.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2000年第5期116-128,共13页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
不起诉
裁量权
救济程序
制约
Non pros
discretion
relief procedure
check
