摘要
实验1和实验2依据目标字和非目标字两种条件，比较了再认、整字偏好、包含、排除四类测验。在“过程不纯净”假设的前提下．检验了加工分离说（PDP）的修正模型并得到以下结果：（1）PDP修正馍型的结论与匹配比较法的结果吻合。本实验条件下，偏好测验是“纯净”的．但无意识影响参与了再认测验。（2）PDP修正模型关于R＞R。的理论结果得到了目标字与非目标字两种条件下的实验的证实。另外．关于无意识影响遵循的规律与指导语无关的理论推测也得到了证实。（3）再认与偏好测验出现了功能分离。PDP修正模型可以解释其本质。（4）750ms呈现刺激时，反应倾向的规津是：外显过程比内隐过程严格；两过程均不受注意程度的作用而发生波动。
The purpose of our two experiments was to test the revised process dissociation procedure with the 'impure process' as assumption by means of comparing the tests of precdgnition, preference, inclusion. and exclusion respectively under the conditions of cued or uncued Chinese characters. our results: 1) The conclusion of the revised model was consistent with the results of the matched comparison appoach. In experiments Ⅰ and 2, the prefference tests were process-pure, while the recognition tests included unconscious influences. 2)The revised model predicted that recollection of the revision (R)would be greater than that of the experiments. The prediction that unconscious influences under implicit and explicit instructions would follow the same rules was also verified. 3)There appeared fuctional dissociation in the recognition and preference tests,the nature of which could be accounted for by the revised model. 4)The response bias rule was that the explicit process was more strict than the implicit process and the attention did not affect both processes.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
1997年第1期26-30,95,共6页
Journal of Psychological Science
关键词
内隐记忆
汉字
加工分离说的修正模型
包含和排除测验
implicit memory, Chinese characters, the revised model of process dissociation procedure, inclusion and exclusion tests
