期刊文献+

日本弥生时代居民与中国古代居民的人种学比较 被引量:4

原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper employs the Euclidean distance clustering method on the cramal data of 18 groups of ancient population. Among them, six groups are Jomon specimens of Japan, 12 groups come fronl South, North and Northeast China of the Neolithic, Bronze and early iron Ages.The results of multivariate analysis indicate that the Jomon population is closest to the Northeastern groups of China and a few Huanghe Basin groups.The author argues that the Jomon population was derved mainly from the ancient population of Northeast China and partly from that of the Huanghe Basin. This paper employs the Euclidean distance clustering method on the cramal data of 18 groups of ancient population. Among them, six groups are Jomon specimens of Japan, 12 groups come fronl South, North and Northeast China of the Neolithic, Bronze and early iron Ages.The results of multivariate analysis indicate that the Jomon population is closest to the Northeastern groups of China and a few Huanghe Basin groups.The author argues that the Jomon population was derved mainly from the ancient population of Northeast China and partly from that of the Huanghe Basin.
作者 潘其风 朱泓
出处 《华夏考古》 1999年第4期63-67,85,共6页 Huaxia Archaeology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1王令红,人类学学报,1988年,7卷,206页
  • 2吴新智,人类学学报,1988年,7卷,287页
  • 3李恭笃,考古,1985年,6期,550页
  • 4邵象清,人体测量手册,1985年
  • 5丁细藩,解剖学通报,1984年,7卷,174页
  • 6张振标,古脊椎动物学报,1982年,20卷,72页
  • 7韩康信,考古学报,1975年,1期,157页
  • 8张怀韬,解剖学通报,1965年,2卷,8页
  • 9朱泓,北方文物,1989年,2期,45页
  • 10焦南峰,考古与文物,1985年,3期,85页

共引文献63

同被引文献48

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部