期刊文献+

股骨粗隆间骨折两种不同固定方法疗效比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较股骨粗隆间骨折采用两种不同内固定方法的疗效。方法股骨粗隆间骨折180例患者采用滑动加压动力髋螺钉(DHS)、股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)治疗,并对治疗结果进行比较。结果 PFN组在手术时间、术中与术后出血、X线暴露次数比DHS组有较大差异,术中、术后并发症无明显差异。结论对ⅠA型无移位和ⅠB型部分移位的骨折,两种内固定方法均可采用;对Ⅱ、Ⅲ型骨折,适用PFN。
作者 李跃民 李鹏
机构地区 襄汾县人民医院
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2012年第S1期14-15,共2页 The Medical Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1王亦璁 孟继懋 郭子恒主编.骨与关节损伤[M](第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1992.46l-462.
  • 2Jensen JS, Miehaelsen M. Troehanteric femoral fractures treated with McLaughlin Osteosynthesis. Acta Orthop Stand, 1975, 46: 795-803.
  • 3Parker M J, Palmer CR. A nev, mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1993, 75: 797-798.
  • 4Kitamura S. Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S. et al. Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. Clin Orthop, 1998, (348): 29-36.
  • 5Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Kelleer MS. Early fixation reduces morbidity and mortalilv in elderly patients with hip fractures from low-impact falls. J Trauma, 1995, 39: 261-265.
  • 6Baixauli F, Vicent V, Baixauli E, et al. A reinforced rigid fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop. 1999,(361): 205-215.
  • 7Parker MJ. Trochanteric hip fractures: fixation failure commoner with femoral medialization: a comparison of 101 cases. Acta Orthop Seand, 1996, 67: 329-332.
  • 8Simmermacher RK, Rosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail(PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fracture. Injury, 1999. 30: 327-332.
  • 9Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, et at. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or 95 ° screw-plate. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2002,84: 372-381.
  • 10Herrra A. Domingo LJ, Catvo A, et at. A comparative study of the trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal nail. Int Orthop, 2002, 26: 365-369.

共引文献487

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部