摘要
目的:比较锁定加压钢板对比解剖钢板对于胫骨远端骨折的治疗疗效。方法:将60例胫骨远端骨折患者随机分为两组,分别标记为观察组、对照组。观察组患者给予锁定加压钢板处理,对照组给予解剖钢板处理,对比两组患者的临床治疗效果及并发症情况。结果:对照组总有效率为60.00%,观察组总有效率为90.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组,而且在伤口感染方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨远端骨折疗效佳,并发症发生率低,值得临床推广使用。
Objective: To compare the curative effect of locking compression plate and anatomical plate on treating distal tibial fractures. Methods: 60 patients with distal tibial fractures were randomly divided into two groups, labeled as the control group, the observation group. The control group was treated with anatomical plate; the observation group was given locking compression plate. Clinical outcomes and complications of the two groups of patients were compared. Results:The total efficiency of the control group was 60.00%;the total efficiency of the observation group was 90.00%, the difference between the two groups had statistic significance, P<0.05. The complications of the observation group was low than the control group, and the difference about wound infection between the two groups had statistic significance, P<0.05. Conclusion:Locking compression plate fixation is effective on treating distal tibial fractures, low complication rate, worthy of clinical application.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2013年第23期108-109,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词
锁定加压钢板
解剖钢板
胫骨远端骨折
疗效
Locking compression plate
Anatomical plate
Distal tibial fractures
Effect
