期刊文献+

美国的证据开示程序与相关国际公约的冲突问题研究 被引量:1

Research on the Conflict between the American Transnational Discovery and Some Related International Conventions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证据开示程序是美国国内民事诉讼中获取证据的一项重要制度,是指当事人主动向对方寻找证据和信息的一种权利。由于各国法律文化上的差异,诉讼制度存在很大的区别,美国单方面的证据开示程序,遭到了世界上众多国家的反对;国际社会一直致力于发展这一领域的合作,并出台了相关的国际公约。尽管相关的国际公约在美国证据开示程序与其他国家诉讼制度冲突方面发挥着作用,但其也遗留下了一些未清理的问题。美国国内民事诉讼中的Aerospatiale案对协调各国与美国在取证问题上产生重大的障碍作用,导致了国际社会的强烈对抗。 The procedure of discovery is a special rule in American civil procedural law,which endows any party with getting his evidence from others.Because of the difference of law culture in the world,the procedural rules vary greatly.The American procedure of one-sided discovery begets much opposition from other countries.International community works for developing cooperation in this field and lays down many conventions.Although some related international conventions play an important role in harmonizing the conflict,they have many problems which are not solved easily as well.The case of Aerospatiale in American civil procedural law baffles the cooperation of the taking evidence between America and other countries in the world,which leads to the fierce opposition from international community.
作者 王育琪
机构地区 仰恩大学
出处 《学术问题研究》 2007年第2期65-71,共7页 Academic Research(Integrated Edition)
关键词 证据开示程序 《海牙取证公约》 Aerospatiale案 discovery Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters the case of Aerospatiale
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Pierburg GmbH&Co v.Superior Court of Los An-geles. 186Cal.Rptr.876 . 1982
  • 2Y Daphne Coelho-Adam.Fishing for the Smoking Gun:The Need for British Courts to Grant American Style Ex-traterritorial Discovery Requests in U.S.Industry-Wide Tort Actions. Vand.J.Transna’l.L . 2000
  • 3Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v.U.S.District Court. 482U.S522 . 1987
  • 4Stephen B.Burbank.The World in Our Courts. Mich.L.Rev . 1991
  • 5John C.Plaster.The Hague Evidence Convention:the Need for Guidance on Procedures and Resolution of Con-flicts in Transnational Discovery. Vand.J.Transnat’l L . 1994
  • 6Haynes v.Kleinwefers. 119FRD335 . 1988
  • 7Benton Graphics v.Uddeholm Corp. 118FRD386 . 1987
  • 8Hudson v.Hermann Pfanter GmbH&Co. 117FRD33 . 1987
  • 9Sandsend Financial Consultants v.Wood. 743SW2d364 .
  • 10Scarminach v.Goldwell GmbH. 140Misc.2d103,107 . 1988

同被引文献24

  • 1王孛.美国与欧盟个人信息跨国流通安全港协议简论[J].知识经济,2008(4):46-47. 被引量:13
  • 22005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 15685 (S. D. N.Y. 2005).
  • 3Hagenbuch v. 3B6 Sistemi Elettronici Industriali S. R. L. , 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20049, at * 14 (N. D. Ⅲ. 2005).
  • 4Husa v. Laboratolres Servler SA, 326 N.J. Super. 150, 156 (App. Div. 1999). ;120 In re Perrier Bottled Water Litigation, 138 F.R.D. 348 (D. Conn. 1991).
  • 51959 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir. 1992).
  • 6The Sedona Conference Framework for Analysis of Cross-Border Discovery Conflicts; A Practical Guide to Navigating the Competing Currents of International Data Privacy and Discovery, 2008 Public Comment Version,p. 15 ,pl 1.
  • 7Shannon Capone Kirk, Emily Cobb and Michael Robotti. When U.S. E-Discovery Meets EU Roadblocks[ J]. The National Law Journal December 22, 2008. 10.
  • 8Privacy & Security Law Report, 8 PVLR 1240, 8/24/2009. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800 -372 -1033) http.// www. bna. corn, visited on Nov. l, 20.
  • 9Carla L. Reyes. The U.S. Discovery-EU Privacy Directive Conflict. Constructing A Three-Tiered Compliance Strategy[J]. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol. 19,2009 ,pp. 373 -76.
  • 10Marissa L. P. Caylor. Moderning the Hague Evidence Convention. A Proposed Solution to Cross-Border Discovery Conflicts During Civil and Commercial Litigation. [ J]. Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 28,2010 ,p. 368,.

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部