期刊文献+

在多元一体中寻找“我们”——从社会心理学看共识的建构 被引量:10

In Search of "Us" in the Context of Pluralistic Integration——A Socio-psychological Approach to Consensus Building
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "中国梦"的实现需要上下"同心","同心"在当前社会转型的背景下,重在将"多元"有机地凝聚成"一体"。"社会凝聚力"与"社会共识"是"同心"的两个不同面相。社会凝聚的社会心理机制主要有"关系化"、"类别化"、"镶嵌化"三种,其中"镶嵌化"机制最适宜于构建多元一体关系。"镶嵌化"机制的有效实施,仰赖于对社会结构的扁平化调整。社会共识须藉由政府与群体间、群际间以及群体内的双向沟通来达成。 The fulfillment of the 'Chinese Dream' requires all the people to 'work with one mind'. Against the background of social transformation characterized by the diversification of the interested parties, 'working with one mind' mainly refers to bringing the 'diversification' into 'an organic whole'. 'Social cohesion' and 'social consensus' are two different aspects of 'working with one mind'. There are three types of socio-psychological mechanisms underpinning social cohesion: 'guanxilization', 'categorization' and 'tessellation', and 'tessellation' is most suitable for constructing a pluralistic integration relationship. The effective implementation of the mechanism of 'tessellation' depends on the flattenization of social structure. The social consensus urgently needs to be achieved through the communication between the government and groups as well as communications among and within these groups.
出处 《学术前沿》 2013年第7期23-30,共8页 Frontiers
关键词 多元一体 社会共识 社会表征 Pluralisticintegration,socialconsensus,socialrepresentations
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1杨宜音,张曙光.在“生人社会”中建立“熟人关系”对大学“同乡会”的社会心理学分析[J].社会,2012,32(6):158-181. 被引量:34
  • 2I Lau,C Chiu,S Lee.Communication and shared reality: implications for the psychological foundations of culture[].Social Cognition.2001
  • 3Yang,Y,Chen,M,Chen,W,Ying,X,Wang,B,Wang,J,Kolstad A."The effects of boundary-permeated self andpatriotism on social participation in BeijingOlympic Games"[].Asian Journal of SocialPsychology.2010
  • 4S.Moscovici."The Phenomenon ofSocial Representations"[].Social Representations.1984

二级参考文献18

  • 1杨宜音.《自己人:一项有关中国人关系分类的个案研究》[J].本土心理学研究,2001,(13).
  • 2贝克,乌尔里希、伊丽莎白·贝克一吉恩斯海姆.2011.个体化的种类[G]//“自我中国”-现代中国社会中个体的崛起.贺美德、鲁纳,编.许烨芳,等,译.上海译文出版社.
  • 3Brewer, M. B. 1979. "In-Group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive- Motivational Analysis." Psychological Bulletin 86 (2).
  • 4Brewer, M. B. 1991. "The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (17).
  • 5Brewer. M. B. 1993. "Social Identity, Distinctiveness, and In-Group Homogeneity." Social Cognition ( 11).
  • 6Chen, Xiaoping and Chen Chao C. 2004. "On the Intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi~ A Process Model of Guanxi Development." Asia Pacific Journal of Management (21).
  • 7Echterhoff, G. 2012. "Shared Reality Theory." In Paul Van Lange, Arie Kruglanski, and E. Tony Higgins (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • 8Hamilton, D. L. 1979. "A Cognitive-Attributional Analysis of Stereotyping." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 12), edited by L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.
  • 9Hardin, C. D. and E. T. Higgins. 1996. "Shared Reality: How Social Verification Makes the Subjective Objective." In R. M. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition : The Interpersonal Context, vol. 3. New York: Guilford Press.
  • 10Hsu, Francis L. K. 1985. "The Self in Cross-Cultural Perspectives." In Anthony J. Marsella, George DeVos and Francis L, K. Hsu (eds,), Culture and Self: Asian and Western Perspectives. New York: Tavistock Publications.

共引文献33

同被引文献116

引证文献10

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部