摘要
考察12年来中美在DSB的争端案件,美国是最积极申诉中国的WTO成员,而中国对美国的申诉案件数量有限且集中于贸易救济措施。WTO争端解决机制以规则为导向,不要求强制执行DSB裁决报告,建议中国更加积极地通过DSB解决中美争端、缓解美国对中国的压力。应诉时注意加强证据的准备工作,执行DSB裁决报告时从实用角度出发,同时构建协调机制,并做好重新定位中国国际经济法学的理论研究工作。
Examining the cases of Sino-US in DSB, as a country of the most active appeal in WTO, US receives few DSB cases from China, and these cases focus on trade remedies. As a rule-oriented mechanism, DSM does not require members to compulsively execute the DSB cases, so China should deal with DSB cases with a more positive attitude. In future, the paper advises China be in a practical point of view to implement DSB reports and to build a coordination mechanism, as well as do more preparation for evidence. And it is time to revalue the studies of Chinese International Economic Law in the new era.
出处
《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2014年第4期137-143,共7页
Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目"全球治理框架下中美汇率争端的法律问题研究"(10CFX078)
关键词
争端解决机制
国家利益
规则导向
dispute settlement mechanism(DSM)
national interests
rule-oriented
