期刊文献+

内置型钢桁架高强混凝土低剪力墙抗震性能研究 被引量:1

Seismic behavior of low-rise high strength reinforced concrete wall with concealed steel truss
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对3个1/4缩尺、剪跨比为1.0的内置型钢桁架高强混凝土低剪力墙试件进行拟静力试验,研究其在低周反复荷载作用下的抗震性能。分析了不同暗柱型钢类型及暗支撑型钢配钢率对试件破坏形态、滞回曲线、骨架曲线、位移延性以及侧向刚度退化的影响。采用有限元软件ABAQUS对试件进行数值模拟。结果表明:内置型钢桁架高强混凝土低剪力墙试件具有弯曲破坏的特征,试件的位移延性与普通高强混凝土低剪力墙相比有明显提高、后期侧向刚度退化曲线更加平缓,说明内置型钢桁架提高其抗震性能的有效性;暗柱型钢及暗支撑型钢配钢率对试件的受剪承载力影响不明显,但对位移延性以及滞回耗能影响显著,当暗支撑相同时,暗柱型钢配钢率提高,试件的受剪承载力有所提高;暗柱型钢相同时,暗支撑型钢配钢率提高能显著提高试件的位移延性和滞回耗能能力。ABAQUS数值模拟结果与试验结果吻合较好。 Considering the effects of different steel ratio of concealed steel columns and diagonal braces,seismic behavior of three 1 /4 scaled low-rise high strength reinforced concrete walls with concealed steel truss, were investigated through quasi-static tests. Numerical analysis by the finite element software ABAQUS was conducted. By studying experiment phenomena, including the failure pattern, hysteresis loops, skeleton curves, displacement ductility and stiffness degradation process,it is indicated that the specimens mainly fail in flexure. The displacement ductility can be improved significantly,and the post-yield stiffness degradation is smoother compared with the normal high strength concrete low-rise shear wall without concealed steel truss,implying the effectiveness of the concealed truss. As the steel ratio of concealed braces is raised,the maximum horizontal bearing capacity is increased slightly,while the displacement ductility and hysteretic energy dissipation capacity can be improved significantly. Numerical simulation results of ABAQUS agreed well with experiment results.
出处 《建筑结构学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期53-60,共8页 Journal of Building Structures
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51108484)
关键词 高强混凝土低剪力墙 型钢桁架 拟静力试验 抗震性能 high strength reinforced concrete low-rise shear wall concealed steel truss quasi-static test seismic performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献36

共引文献125

同被引文献15

  • 1JGJ101-1996,建筑抗震试验方法规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997
  • 2GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 3Vallenas J M, Bertero V V, Popov E P. Hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete structural walls [ R ]. Report No. UBC/EERC-79/20. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, 1979.
  • 4Hines E M, Seible F, Priestley M J N. Cyclic tests of structural walls with highly-confined boundary elements [ R ]. Report No. SSRP-2001/27. San Diego: University of California at San Diego, 2002.
  • 5Sayre B. Performance evaluation of steel reinforced shear walls [ D ]. Los Angeles : University of California, 2003.
  • 6Thomsen J H, Wallace J W. Displacement-based design procedures for slender reinforced concrete structural walls-experimental verification [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2004, 130 ( 4 ) : 618- 630.
  • 7Dazio A, Beyer K, Bachmann H. Quasi-static cyclic tests and plastic hinge analysis of RC structural walls [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31 (7) : 1556- 1571.
  • 8Zhao Qiuhong, Astaneh-Asl A. Cyclic behavior of traditional and innovative composite shear walls [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2004, 130 (2) :271-284.
  • 9Eom Tae-Sung, Park Hong-Gun, Lee Cheol-Ho, Kim Jin-Ho, Chang In-Hwa. Behavior of double skin composite wall subjected to in-plane cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2009, 135 (10) : 1239-1249.
  • 10Dan D, Fabian A, Stoian V. Theoretical and experimental study on composite steel-concrete shear wall with vertical steel encased profiles [ J ]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2001, 67 ( 5 ) : 800- 813.

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部