摘要
司法判决既是一项技术性作业,也是一个多元价值整合过程。在法治社会中,判断个案判决之正当性的首要标准,是判决依据的合法性。唯有凭借基于内部视角的合法性标准,才能实现法律对司法过程和当事人的拘束、对公众行为和社会生活的引导。但在疑难案件中,法官必须结合基于外部视角的合理性标准,才能得出正确的判决。由于合理性标准关连着主观性和语境性,因此基于合理性标准的疑案判决,必须接受客观性标准和融贯性标准的拘束和检验。裁判依据的合法性、合理性、客观性和融贯性,是衡量判决正当性的四个规定性要素。
Judging is a process not only of exercising legal technique,but also of integrating plural values and interests. In a rule-by-law society,the first and primary criterion to judge the legitimacy of individual judgment is the legality of ratio decidendi. Without the legality-standard based on the internal perspective,there is no way for law to constrain the legal process and litigating parties,and guide human behavior and social life. However,in complicated cases,judges could not get right decision if he refuses to consider the rationality-standard based on external perspective. Since rationality-standard is subjected to subjectivity and context,the decision in complicated cases which rationality-standard has been taken into consideration must be restricted by and examined under the objectivity-standard and coherence-standard. The four descriptive factors,legality,rationality,objectivity and coherence,together determine the legitimacy of judgments.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期23-31,172-173,共11页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"司法决策的心理学研究"(NCET-13-0512)
国家社科基金项目"疑案裁判中的法律判断模型研究"(10CFX033)阶段性成果
关键词
正当判决
合法性
合理性
客观性
融贯性
Legitimate Judgment
Legitimacy
Rationality
Objectivity
Coherence
