摘要
通过分析《文心雕龙》《序志》篇、"文之枢纽"5篇,以及其他相关篇目内容,对一些重要用语做细致解读,在此基础上,对于研究中所形成的某些结论提出不同看法。认为,《文心雕龙》文体论20篇与与后半部谈文理共性问题25篇其重要性难分轩轾;全书的基本文学思想是宗经,而不是"执正"加"驭奇";刘勰在提倡宗经的同时,又把儒家经典作品文学化了,他由此而视儒家经典为重要的文章学资源,意在推动文学朝既雅且丽的方向发展。
Based on the close reading of'Preface to the Records(Xu Zhi)',five parts of The Hub of Text,some related literary works and important terms in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons(Wen Xin Diao Long),the paper holds the importance of the first 20 sheets on stylistics and the later 25 sheets in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons makes no difference.The literary thoughts in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons are canonization of the Confucian classics rather than regularity and eccentricity.Liu Xie advocated canonization of the Confucian classics and also made the Confucian classics more literary.Therefore,Liu Xie considered the Confucian classics as important resources of literary works so that literary works turned to be more elegant and refined.
出处
《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期118-124,共7页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"东亚<诗品><文心雕龙>文献研究集成"(14ZDB068)的阶段性成果
关键词
《文心雕龙》
宗经
执正
驭奇
儒家经典
文学化
The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons(Wen Xin Diao Long),canonization of the Confucian classics,regularity,eccentricity,C
