摘要
目的 :运用针灸治疗镇痛泵术后急性尿潴留 36例 ,并观察比较针灸和新斯的明治疗尿潴留的疗效差别。方法 :针灸组同时运用针刺和艾灸 ;药物组单纯运用新斯的明肌注治疗。结果 :针灸组有效 30例 ,有效率 88.89% ,药物组有效 2 4例 ,有效率6 6 .6 7% ,两组相比 ,有显著差异 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :针灸组治疗应用镇痛泵术后尿潴留效果明显优于新斯的明药物组 ,疗效肯定。
Purpose: To treat 36 cases of ache-relieving pump postoperative Uroschesis, and to observe and compare the therapeutic differences of uroschesis treated respectively by acupuncture and moxibustion and Xin Sidiming. Method: The acupuncture groups were treated by acupuncture and moxibustion, while the drug guoup by Xin Sidiming intramuscular. Result: The acupuncture group had an effective rate of 88.89% with 30 effective cases, while the drug group had an effective rate of 66.67% with 24effective cases. Compared with each other, the two groups had a remarkable difference( P <0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of ache-relieving pump postoperative uroschesis, the therapeutic effect of the acupuncture group is evidently superior to that of the drug group.
出处
《河南中医》
2004年第5期64-65,共2页
Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
针灸疗法
术后尿潴留
镇痛泵
新斯的明
Acupuncture and moxibustion therapy
postoperative uroschesis
ache-relieving pump
Xin Sidiming
