1Yasui N, Kojimoto H, Sasaki K, et al. Factors affecting callus distraction in limb lengthening. Clin Orthop , 1993, 293: 55-60.
2Paccione MF, Mehrara B J, Warren SM, et al. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: latency, rate and rhythm determine the adaptive response. J Craniofac Surg, 2001, 12:175-182.
3Tavakoli K, Walsh WR, Bonar F, et al. The role of latency is mandibular osteodistraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1998, 26: 209-219.
4Chin M, Toth BA. Le Fort Ⅲ advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1997,100: 819-830.
5Weinzweig J, Baker SB, Mackay GJ, et al. Immediate versus delayed midface ditraction in a primate model using a new intraoral internal device. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002, 109: 1600-1610.
6Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue: part Ⅱ. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop, 1989, 239:263-285.
7Farhadieh RD, Gianoutsos MP, Dickinson R, et al. Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical, mineralization, and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2000,105 : 889-895.
8al Ruhaimi KA. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: an experimental investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2001, 30: 220-227.
9Li G, Simpson AH, Kenwright J, et al. Assessmant of cell proliferation in regenerating bone during distraction osteogenesis at different distractraction rates. J Orthop Res, 1997, 15: 765-772.
10Li G, Simpson AH, Kenwright J, et al. Effect of lengthening rate on angiogenesis during distraction ostegenesis. J Orthop Res, 1999, 17: 362-367.
