期刊文献+

中国古代的关联性思维与主体的责任 被引量:3

Intersubjectivity and Correlative Thinking in Ancient China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当下中国在追寻文化认同与传统中兴的实践中,蕴含着寻求中国性以完成与普世性文化有所区别的自我界定。其中,古代中国的关联性思维方式,通过后现代的主体间性思维方式在当下中国得以表达。这表明中国特质的传统思维方式业已可能超越东西对立的讨论框架,开始参与共同迈向面对现实世界与日常生活的建设性的文化复兴与交流运动。 In ancient China, correlative thinking has the specialities of non-rationalism and non-logicism, which have some familiar or homogenous relations to post-modernity of anti-rationalism and anti-logicism. Now Chinese are pursuing culture identity and tradition resurgence, that is to say, Chinese are seeking a Chinese characteristic different from the universalistic for culture self-identity. This process have already exceeded the talking framework that eastern civilization and western civilization are opposite each other probably , and then , declare the beginning of constructive culture reconstruction and exchange towards moral practice anddaily living.
作者 孙邦金
出处 《温州师范学院学报》 2004年第4期67-71,共5页 Journal of Wenzhou Teachers College(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词 关联性思维 主体间性 中国性 后现代性 correlative thinking intersubjectivity Chinese characteristic post-modernity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Haun Saussy,Correlative Cosmology and its Histories [J] .Stochholm:Toungpao, 2000 (72).
  • 2John B. Henderson,Cosmology and Concepts of Naturein Traditional China[Z].未刊会议论文.
  • 3安乐哲.和而不同:比较哲学与中西会通[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002..
  • 4Aihe Wang,Correlative Cosmology:From the structure of Mind to Embodied Practice[J]. Stockholm:Toungpao,2000 (72).
  • 5索安.西方道教研究编年史[M].北京:中华书局,2002..
  • 6荆门市博物馆.郭店楚墓竹简[Z].北京:文物出版社,1998..
  • 7Z鲍曼.现代性与大屠杀[M].上海:译林出版社,2002..

共引文献23

同被引文献73

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部