摘要
在 2 0世纪 2 0年代兴起的整理国故运动中 ,围绕着胡适和梁启超给清华学生开列的“最低限度的国学书目”出现了争论。胡适的“最低限度的国学书目” ,反映了他具体实践整理国故主张的一个方面 ,即把国学研究史学化 ,用文化史的眼光统整国学研究的范围。梁启超则从“狭义的”文化史观念出发 ,对胡适提出了质询与批评。他们都对转型中的中国史学的发展方向提出了自己的见解。
Hu Shi and Liang Qichao had the different view on the lowest limit of the book list of the Chinese national culture in the movement of sorting out our national cultural heritage. Hu Shi maintained that we should sort out the range of the Chinese national culture study with the eyes of cultural history. His opinion was criticized by Liang Qichao, because Liang Qichao thought the cultural history in a narrow sense of the term. Despite of their debate, they raised their opinions about the direction of the Chinese historical study. [
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期41-47,共7页
Journal of Historiography
