期刊文献+

哲学与跨学科研究 被引量:14

Phylosophy and Interdisciplinary Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要  人类学科文化经过了三个发展阶段,第一阶段以古希腊为代表,哲学和学科关系较为平衡。第二阶段主要是现代时期,近代科学革命铸就了以专业化、学科化为特质的知识规范和体系,在这一过程中,哲学从原创性、普遍性科学变成了辅助性的科学反思工具。近代学科文化价值并非是永恒有效的,因为它加重了学科冲突危机,而且不能有效解决全球性和复杂性的大问题。近代学科文化向跨学科文化演变有其历史必然性,跨学科运动是当代学科文化的主流发展趋势。跨学科研究不同于交叉学科研究,后者是在既定学科框架下的综合研究,前者则是以整体性和复杂性为前提的研究。为赶超世界科学水平,中国有必要将跨学科研究哲学及其方法列为国家科学和教育发展战略。 The discipline culture of mankind has experienced three stages. In the first stage, ancient Greece primarily represented the character —— the relation between phylocophy and discipline was approximately balanced. And in the contemporary age, the konwledge standards and systems resulted from modern scientific revolution showed obvionsly the features of specialization and branch eleboration, which cansed phylosophy to become a associated selfquestioning tool only. The fact that the extremely complex problems on a global scale cannot be solved provides a motivation for the thinkers to reragd the interdisciplinary reserach as a essential aspect, which is considered under the major premise of the entirety and complexity to distinguish from socalled branch intersection research.
出处 《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第3期11-20,共10页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
关键词 哲学 跨学科研究 交叉学科研究 phylosophy interdisciplinary research branch intersection research
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]Flinterman, J.F., Teclemariam-Mesbah, R., Broerse, J.E.W. en Bunders, J.F.G. Transdisciplinarity: The New Challenge for Biomedical Research[J]. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society,2001,Vol. 21. No. 4, pp. 253-266.
  • 2[2]Klein, J.Th., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., H?berli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R.W. en Welti, M. (eds.) Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem-Solving among science, technology and society[M]. An effective way of managing complexity. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag,2001.
  • 3[4]Julie Thompson Klein, Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice[M]. Detroit: Wayne State University, 1990.
  • 4[5]Julie Thompson Klein. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities[M]. Charlottesville VA: University Press of Virginia ,1996.
  • 5[6]Michael Gibbons, et al. The New Production of Knowledge[M]. London: Sage, 1994.
  • 6[9]Albert E. Utton, et al., ed., Interdisciplinary Environmental Approaches[M]. Educational Media Press, 1974.
  • 7[10]N. S. Cooper, et al., ed., Ecologists and Ethical Judgements[M]. Chapman & Hall, 1996.
  • 8[11]David R. Keller, et al., ed., The Philosophy of Ecology: from science to synthesis[M]. The University of Georgia Press, 2000.
  • 9[12]克劳斯*迈因策尔.复杂性中的思维:物质、精神和人类的复杂动力学[M].曾国屏译.北京:中央编译出版社,2000.
  • 10[14]赫尔曼·哈肯.协同学:大自然构成的奥秘[M].凌复华译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,上海译文出版社,2001.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Jacques DE BANDT, 2002, De 1' exigence interdi-sciplinaire, Faire Savoirs, No. 2-octobre.
  • 2Programme《Systemes complexes en SHS》, in http://www. lps. ens. fr/% 7 Eweisbuch /systemes- complexes. html.
  • 3Projet de Recherche Modelisations, Simulations et Gestiondes Systemes Complexes, in http://histseienees. univparisl. fr/projetsrecherche/MSGSC/ ACImodele. pdf.

共引文献1

同被引文献176

引证文献14

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部