期刊文献+

论理解的历史性和解释的客观性 被引量:2

On the Historicity of Understanding and the Objectivity of Interpretation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 解释学的根本任务是探讨"主体内"的思想如何能在"主体间"进行交流和沟通。理解和解释不应被看作是纯粹主观性的行为,而是要受到传统和理解对象的历史性的限制。另一方面,"意义"也不应被视为固定不变的自在之物,它应该是在文本和读者共同参与下才会产生的。 The fundamental goal of hermeneutics has always been to find a satisfactory anwser to the question of how 'subject-internal' thought can get communicated intersubjectively. Understanding should not be seen as something totally subjective, they are actually restricted by tradition and the historical condition of the target of understanding; nor should 'meaning' be looked at as something which has independent existence, it is actually the result of joint efforts of the author/speaker and the reader/listener.
作者 辛斌
出处 《四川外语学院学报》 2004年第5期73-77,共5页 Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
关键词 理解 解释 历史性 客观性 understanding interpretation historicity objectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1罗斯诺.后现代主义与社会科学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1998..
  • 2伽达默尔著 洪汉鼎译.真理与方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1999..
  • 3施莱尔马赫 译.诠释学讲演(1819-1832)[A].洪汉鼎.理解与解释—诠释学经典文选[C].上海:东方出版社,2001a..
  • 4施莱尔马赫 译.诠释学箴言(1805-1810)[A].洪汉鼎.理解与解释—诠释学经典文选[C].上海:东方出版社,20018..
  • 5狄尔泰 李超杰译.对他人及其生命表现的理解[A].洪汉鼎.理解与解释—诠释学经典文选[C].东方出版社,2001.99-109.
  • 6布莱.批评意识现象学[A].王海远等.东渐之西湖[C].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2000.483-484.
  • 7塞德曼.后现代转向[C].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2001,8..
  • 8罗萨尔多.社会分析的主观性[A].塞德曼.后现代转向[C].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2001..
  • 9Barthes,R.From Work to Text [A].In J.V.Harari(ed.).Textual Strategies: Perspectivesin Post-Structuralist Criticism[C].London: Methuen,1979.77.
  • 10Barthes,R.Images,Music,Text[C].New York: Hill and Wang,1977.148.

共引文献264

同被引文献40

  • 1塞德曼.后现代转向[C].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2001,8..
  • 2伽达默尔著 洪汉鼎译.真理与方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1999..
  • 3伽达默尔.真理与方法-哲学诠释学的基本特征[M].洪汉鼎,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.
  • 4Thiselton, Anthony. Two Horizons: New Testament Hermeneutics and Philosophical Description [M]. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980: 165.
  • 5巴特,罗兰.2012,s/z[M].屠友祥译.上海:上海人民出版社.
  • 6勒梅特.2001.后结构主义与社会学[C]∥塞德曼.后现代转向,沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.355-378.
  • 7利奥特.2001.后现代状况[C]∥塞德曼,后现代转向,沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.35-50.
  • 8Alvaro,J.J.2013.Discursive representations of a dissiden[tJ].Discourse&Society 24(3):289-314.
  • 9Barker,C.&D.Galasiński.2001.Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis:A Dialogue on Language and Identity[M].London:SAGE.
  • 10Barthes,R.1979.From work to tex[tC]∥J.Hariri.Textual Strategies:Perspectives in Poststructuralist Criticism.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部