摘要
目的比较粗大运动功能测试量表 (GMFM )与Peabody粗大运动发育量表 (PDMS GM )两种粗大运动评估方法在脑瘫康复疗效评估中的应用价值。方法用GMFM和PDMS GM两种方法对 2 9例脑瘫儿童进行 3次评估 ,用t检验分析GMFM月相对百分比与PDMS GM月相对百分比之间的差异。结果GMFM的月相对百分比与PDMS GM的月相对百分比之间有显著性差异。结论GMFM的评估结果比PDMS
Objective To compare the advantages of two gross motor measure scales, Peabody Developmental Measure Scale Gross Motor (PDMS GM) and Gross Motor Function Measure Scale (GMFM), in the evaluation of children with cerebral palsy (CP).Methods The gross motor functions of 29 CP children, 0-3 years old, were evaluated three times using PDMS GM and GMFM respectively. The improvement percentile each month of PDMS GM and GMFM were compared by t test.Results There was significant difference between the improvement percentile each month of PDMS GM and GMFM. Conclusion The GMFM was more sensitive than PDMS GM in the evaluation of CP children especially in the evaluation of treatment effect.
出处
《中国康复理论与实践》
CSCD
2004年第7期423-424,共2页
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
