摘要
本文运用宪法逻辑学的方法 ,从本体论、认识论和价值论三个角度探讨了“应然性”的内涵 ,指出在价值论意义上的“应该”的逻辑形式表现为确定性和不确定性两个价值区域。作为确定性的“应该”表现为以认识论为基础而产生的“不得不”和“不应该”。“不得不”作为一种能力判断是被传统的法哲学所遗忘的范畴 ,它可以避免“假设”理论给应然性所造成的过度不确定性 ,因此 ,应当将“不得不”作为考察具有最低限度确定性的“应该”的逻辑准则。“不应该”是超越各种文化内涵之上的普遍主义准则。作者基于对应然性的逻辑分析 ,指出应然的宪法和宪法的应然性属于两个不同的价值范畴 ,并由此区分了“前宪法现象”与“宪法现象”在构建宪法价值体系中的不同功能 ,强调现代宪法的价值核心是一种“法治法”。
By means of constitutional logic this paper examines the intension of “ought to be' from the three perspectives: ontology, epistemology and axiology. According to the paper, the logical form of “ought to' in the sense of axiology has two fields of value: certainty and uncertainty. On the basis of logical analysis of “ought to be' the author points out that the “ought to be' constitution and the “ought to be' of constitution belong to two different categories of value. The functions of “pre constitutional phenomena' and “constitutional phenomena' in the construction of the system of constitutional value are differentiated. It is stressed that the core of value of modern constitutions is a “law to legislate over legality.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第6期85-96,共12页
Social Sciences in China
