期刊文献+

瑞芬太尼与芬太尼复合异丙酚静脉麻醉的临床效果比较 被引量:11

Clinical Effect on Venous Anesthesia with Remifentanil, Fentanyl Combined with Disprofol
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较瑞芬太尼和芬太尼复合异丙酚静脉麻醉的临床效果。方法 选择ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级腹部手术病例 5 0例 ,随机分成试验组 (瑞芬太尼、异丙酚复合组 )和对照组 (芬太尼、异丙酚组 )各 2 5例。术前均肌注阿托品 0 5mg ,入手术室后静注咪唑安定 0 0 5mg/kg ,诱导后 ,试验组用瑞芬太尼 0 2 5 μg/(kg·min) ,异丙酚 10 0~ 2 0 0 μg/(kg·min) ;对照组用芬太尼 0 2 5 μg/(kg·min) ,观察相关指标。 结果  2组术中麻醉效果无显著差异 ,术后复苏后 2组均安静。试验组镇痛作用强于对照组 ,术后恢复前者较快。结论 瑞芬太尼比芬太尼更优越、安全。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of remifentanil and fentanyl combined with disprofol in venous anesthesia. Methods 50 cases abdominal operation with ASA Ⅰ~Ⅲ were divided into test group (remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg·min and disprofol) and control group (fentanyl 0.25 μg/kg·min and disprofol) every 25 cases. The relative data were observed. Results There was no significant difference between two groups in anesthesia effect and recovery after operation. But the analgesia effect in test group was better than that in control group and quickly recovered. Conclusion The effect of remifentanil might be better tan fentanyl with safety.
作者 李大文
出处 《黑龙江医学》 2004年第10期738-739,共2页 Heilongjiang Medical Journal
关键词 麻醉学 瑞芬太尼 异丙酚 比较 Anesthesiology Remifentanil Fentanyl Comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1段世明 主编.麻醉药理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.78-83.
  • 2[2]Mccollum J S C,Dundee J W.Comparision of the Characteristics of four intrarenous anesehetic agents[J].Anaesthesia,1986,41:995.
  • 3吴新民,叶铁虎,岳云,许幸,易杰,田芳玲.国产注射用盐酸瑞芬太尼有效性和安全性的评价[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2003,23(4):245-248. 被引量:499
  • 4[4]Cleags M A,Gepts E,Camu F.haemody namic changes during anaesthesia,induced and maibtained with propofol[J].Br J Anuesth,1988,60:3.

共引文献518

同被引文献38

引证文献11

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部