期刊文献+

米安色林与米帕明对抑郁症患者社会功能影响的比较 被引量:2

Comparison of the effects of mianserine and imipramine on the social function in patients with depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较米安色林与米帕明对抑郁症患者社会功能的影响。方法:将符合中国精神疾病分类与诊断标准第3版中关于抑郁症诊断标准的患者100例,随机分为米安色林组(n=50)和米帕明组(n=50),分别服用米安色林和米帕明,初始剂量分别为30和75mg/d,3d内将剂量分别增加到60和150mg/d,再根据病情增减剂量;用社会功能缺陷量表(SDSS)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、副反应量表(TESS)评定;并进行多元逐步回归分析。结果:两组间治疗前及治疗后各阶段HAMD评分比较,差异均无显著性(t=0.07~0.54,P均>0.05);治疗后各阶段与同组治疗前比较,差异均有非常显著性(t=2.72~2.89,P均<0.01)。两组治疗后SDSS评分与治疗前比较,差异均有显著性(t=2.82~2.91,P均<0.01);米帕明组治疗后第10和第12个月SDSS评分均高于米安色林组,差异有显著性(t=2.29,2.24,P均<0.05)。多元逐步回归分析显示,影响社会功能的因素为药物类型、伴精神病性症状、家庭社会支持、发作次数(t=-3.178,2.863,2.563,-2.346,P均<0.05~0.01)。结论:抑郁症患者社会功能的改善与症状不一致,米安色林比米帕明能较好地改善抑郁症患者社会功能,更有利于患者适应社会。 AIM:To compare the social function of patients with depression treated with mianserine or imipramine. METHODS:A total of 100 depressive patients,who were in accordance with the third edition of the Chinese Classification and Diagnostic Criteria of Mental Disorders(CCMD 3),were randomly assigned into mianserine group(n=50) and imipramine group(n=50).The patients were treated with mianserine and imipramine respectively,the initial 30 and 75 mg per day,and added to 60 and 150 mg per day respectively within three days,and then the doses were added or reduced according to the condition of the patients.All the patients were evaluated with the social disability screening schedule(SDSS),Hamilton depressive scale(HAMD) and the treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS),and then the data were analyzed with multiple stepwise regression. RESULTS:There were no significant differences in the HAMD scores before and at different stages after treatment between the two groups(t=0.07 to 0.54,P >0.05), and there were very significant differences before and at different stages after treatment in both groups(t=2.72 to 2.89, P< 0.01). The scores of SDSS after treatment were significantly different from those before treatment in both groups (t=2.82 to 2.91,P< 0.01).The scores of SDSS 10 and 12 months after treatment in the imipramine group were significantly higher than those in the mianserine group(t=2.29, 2.24,P< 0.05).The results of multiple regression analysis showed that the main factors which affected the impaired social function were the type of medicine,psychotic symptoms,social family support system and episode times(t=-3.178,2.863,2.563,-2.346,P< 0.05 to 0.01). CONCLUSION:The improvement of social function is discrepant with the symptoms in patients with depression.Compared with imipramine,mianserine can improve the social function in depressive patients more effectively,and it is better for the patients to be fit to the society.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2004年第30期6588-6590,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Weissman MM,Waner V,Wichramaratne P,et al.Offspring of depressed parents:ten years later.Arch Gen Psychiaty 1997,,54:932-40
  • 2Paykel ES,Weissman MM.Social adjustment and depression:a longitudinal study.Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973; 28:659-63
  • 3Bexter LR,Schwartz JM,Phelps ME,et al.Reduction of prefrountal coxtex glucose metabolism common to three types of depression.Arch G en Psychiatry 1989; 46:243-7
  • 4Friedman RA,Markowitz JC,Paride M,et al.Acute response of social functioning in dysithymic patients with despramine.Affect Disord 1995; 34:85-8
  • 5Goodwin Fk.Jamison KR.Manic-Depressive Illness.New York,NY:Oxford University Press 1990
  • 6Black DW,Nasrallah A.Hallucinations and delusions in 1751 patients with unipolar and bipolar affective disorders.Psychopathology 1989; 22; 28-34
  • 7张迎黎,李鹤展.社会支持与抑郁症的相关性分析[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(30):4108-4109. 被引量:25
  • 8郭克锋,郭珊,杨文清,朱银星,关菊香,张建设.影响抑郁性神经症患者心理康复的因素[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(27):3704-3705. 被引量:24
  • 9文彬,郑家富.抗抑郁症药物不良反应及药物相互作用[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(12):1804-1805. 被引量:11

二级参考文献21

  • 1程文红,陈申,唐慧琴,刘漪,范娟,李敏,杜亚松.高中生学校回避行为心理防御机制及相关因素的初步研究[J].上海精神医学,2003,15(2):80-82. 被引量:10
  • 2胡琛.5-羟色胺再吸收抑制剂氟西汀[J].国外医药(合成药.生化药.制剂分册),1996,17(1):32-34. 被引量:9
  • 3吴莱文.三环类抗抑郁药[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1988.329-42.
  • 4程富德.氟西汀自杀观念1例[J].中国医院药学杂志,2000,20(5):315-315.
  • 5Keho WA,Sohorr RS.Focus on mirtasapine:a new antideprenaant with mredreaergic and specific serotonergic activity.Formulary,1996;31(5):455.
  • 6De Montigny C,Haddjeri N,Mongean R, et al.The effects of mirtazapine at the interactions between central noradrenergic and sero-tonergic systems,CNS Drugs 1995;4(suppl 1):s13.
  • 7De Boer T.The pharmacologic profile of mirtazapine.Chin Psychiatry,1996;57(suppl 4):s19.
  • 8Montgomery SA,Safety of mirtasapine:a review.Int Clin Psychopharmacel,1995,10(suppl 4):s37.
  • 9Sitsen JMA,Zivkov M.Mirtasapine:clinical profile.CNS Drugs 1995;4(suppl 1):s39.
  • 10鞠波.抗抑郁剂米安色林[J].国外医药(合成药.生化药.制剂分册),1997,18(6):349-352. 被引量:6

共引文献52

同被引文献50

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部