期刊文献+

可配置模糊综合评价系统研究 被引量:2

Research on configurable fuzzy synthesized evaluation system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了克服当前评价系统的评价体系缺乏灵活性、评价形式单一的缺点 ,在模糊综合评价方法的基础上 ,提出了可配置的模糊综合评价系统 ,并给出了系统模型。根据三种评价指标选择方式 ,将评价指标节点划分为AND类型、XOR类型和OR类型 ,将原子评价节点分为赋值原子节点和自动赋值原子节点 ,并给出了综合评价计算方法。提出了自动赋值原子节点的实现方法 ,给出了可配置模糊综合评价模型的实例及体系结构。该系统不但支持多种模糊表示 ,包括语言型、区间型、等级型和组件型等 ,并能将这些模糊表示归一化为三角模糊表示 ,实现了可配置的评价机制。此外 。 To overcome characteristics of lack flexibility and simplified form of current evaluation system, based on Fuzzy Synthesized evaluation method, a Configurable Fuzzy Synthesized Evaluation System was introduced. This system was put forward and system model was constructed. This system introduced three kinds of evaluation index selection nodes which were AND, OR and XOR so that the evaluation system could be configured. This system could not only support many kinds of fuzzy expressions that included language, interval, grade and component expression, but also transformed these expressions to triangle fuzzy expression. Automatic evaluation was also achieved by component invocation. A case study and the structure were provided at last.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第10期1291-1295,共5页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 国家 8 63 /CIMS主题资助项目 ( 2 0 0 1AA415 3 10 2 0 0 1AA412 0 10 )~~
关键词 可配置 表示 组件化 模糊综合评价模型 系统模型 实现方法 节点 评价指标 选择方式 模糊综合评价方法 fuzzy synthesized evaluation configurable evaluation system automatic evaluation by component
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1MORIA M, KURIYAMA Y. A flexible test structure evaluation system for reliability data analysis[A].Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structure[C].1993.6.
  • 2KUBORA K.A high-speed TEG evaluation system integrating parallel continuous processing software and high-speed hardware[A].Proceedings IEEE 1992 International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structure[C].1992.5.
  • 3YAMAGUCHI M.An architecture evaluation system based on the datapath structure and parallel constraint[A].1997 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems[C].Hong Kong,1997.
  • 4张勇斌,马玉书.模糊综合评判开发工具的设计与实现[J].计算机工程与应用,2002,38(9):118-119. 被引量:8
  • 5傅荣林,秦寿康,梁达宏.智能综合评价决策支持系统的实现[J].系统工程,2001,19(3):90-96. 被引量:7

二级参考文献13

共引文献13

同被引文献9

  • 1L Fortuin. Performance indicators-Why where and how? [J], European Journal of Operational Research, 1988,34(5):1-9.
  • 2Kaplan R S, D P Norton.The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Driver Performance[J], Harvard Business Review, 1992,70 ( 1 ) : 71-79.
  • 3Larry L.What About Measuring Supply Chain Performance? [J], The Report On Supply Chain Management,AMR Research,Inc. 1998,1-2.
  • 4Tumey,Peter B B,Common Cents: The ABC Performance Breakthrough[M]. Portland, OR: Cost Technology, 1993.
  • 5D Scdera,G Gable,M Rosemann. A Balanced Scorecard Approach to Enterprise System Performance Measurement [A], Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Information Systems[C] ,2000.
  • 6Kaplan R S,D P Norton. Putting the Balanced Scorecard to work[J] ,Harvard Business Review, 1993,70( 1 ) : 134-142.
  • 7MORIA M ,KURIYAMA Y. A flexible test structure evaluation system for reliability data analysis [A] , Proceedings IEEE/nternafional Conference on Microelectronic Test Structure[C], 1993,6.
  • 8Beamon B M. Measuring Supply Chain Performance [J], International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 1999,19:275-292.
  • 9周涛,程钧谟,乔忠.物流企业绩效评价体系及模糊综合评判[J].物流技术,2002,21(9):26-28. 被引量:47

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部