摘要
目的 :比较浮针与封闭疗法治疗顽固性网球肘的疗效差异。 方法 :将 117例网球肘患者随机分为浮针组 5 7例、封闭组 6 0例 ,观察和比较两组患者症状及体征改变情况。结果 :浮针组痊愈率为 70 2 % ,封闭组为 4 5 0 % ,经统计学处理 ,P <0 0 1,差异有非常显著性意义。结论
Objective To compare therapeutic effects of superficial needling and block therapy on tennis elbow. Methods One hundred and seventeen cases of tennis elbow were randomly divided into superficial needling group ( n =57) and block control group ( n =60). Changes of their symptoms and signs were observed and compared. Results The cured rate was 70 2% in the superficial needling group and 45 0% in the block control group with a very significant difference between the two groups ( P <0 01). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of the superficial needling is obviously better than that of the block therapy.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2004年第9期611-612,共2页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
