期刊文献+

关于中动词及物性的思考 被引量:5

On the transitivity of mid-verbs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于中动词的及物性质有两种观点 :一种观点以Keyser和Roeper为代表 ,认为此类动词是及物动词 ;另一种观点以Perlmutter为代表 ,认为此类动词是不及物动词。针对这两种观点存在的问题 ,在总结大量语言现象的基础上提出"中动词具有中间性"的观点 。 Two views are concerned in the transitivity of middle verb. One, represented by Keyser and Roeper, holds that the middle verb is transitive, while another, whose representative is Perlmutter, attributes it to intransitive verb. Regarding the flaws of the current views, a tentative opinion is put forwnrd on the basis of the summary of a lot of linguistic phenomena. Relevant argumentation is made from the perspective of both cognitive linguistics and generative-transformational linguistics.
作者 许艾明
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第5期649-653,共5页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 及物动词 不及物动词 中动词 中间性 transtive verb intranstive verb mid-verb neuter
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1戴曼纯.中动结构的句法特征[J].外语学刊,2001(4):31-36. 被引量:43
  • 2[2]Perlmutfer, David M. Impersonal passive and unaccusative hypothesis[J]. Berkeley Linguistic Societg, 1978, (4): 157-189.
  • 3韩景泉.英语中间结构的生成[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(3):179-188. 被引量:54
  • 4[4]Fagan S.The English middle[J].Linguistic Inquiry,1988:181-203.
  • 5刘正光,刘润清.Vi+NP的非范畴化解释[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(4):243-250. 被引量:59
  • 6[6]Hopper P, S A Thompson. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar [J]. Language Go, 703-712.
  • 7[7]Chomskey N. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding [M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press,1982.
  • 8[8]Chomskey N. The minimalist program [M]. Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press, 1995.
  • 9[9]Levin B, M Rappaport. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface[M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1995.
  • 10徐盛桓.语义数量特征与英语中动结构[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(6):436-443. 被引量:135

二级参考文献72

  • 1郭继懋.试谈“飞上海”等不及物动词带宾语现象[J].中国语文,1999(5):337-346. 被引量:80
  • 2Achema, P. & M. Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface [J].Lingua 93: 59-90.
  • 3Achema, P. & M. Schoorlemner. 1995. Middles and nonmovement [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173-197.
  • 4Authier, J.-M. & L. Reed. 1996. On the Canadian French middle [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 513-523.
  • 5Carrier, J. & J. Randall. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173-234.
  • 6Chormsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding [M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M].Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • 9Dixon, R. 1991. A New Approach to Grammar, on Semantic Principles [ M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 10Fagan, S. 1988. The English middle [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 181-203.

共引文献254

同被引文献76

  • 1曹宏.论中动句的句法构造特点[J].世界汉语教学,2004,18(3):38-48. 被引量:71
  • 2高兴刚.空算子与中间结构[J].现代外语,2000,23(2):125-136. 被引量:21
  • 3司惠文,余光武.英语中间结构句法致使生成研究[J].现代外语,2005,28(1):1-9. 被引量:26
  • 4何文忠.中动结构的界定[J].外语教学,2005,26(4):9-14. 被引量:105
  • 5胡壮麟,朱永生,张德禄,李战子.系统功能语言学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008:273-274,278.
  • 6中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中英语课程标准(实验)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003.
  • 7吕叔湘.说“胜”和“败”.中国语文,1987,(1).
  • 8Ackema, P. & M. Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface [J]. Lingua 93: 59-90.
  • 9Ackema, P. & M. Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middies and nonmovement (J]. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173-197.
  • 10Condoravdi, C. 1989. The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet [J]. MIT Work- ing Papers in Linguistics 11 : 18-30.

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部