期刊文献+

血清和胸水中肿瘤标志物检测对老年人胸腔积液的诊断价值 被引量:17

Diagnostic value of CYFRA21-1,NSE,CA15-3,CA19-9 and CA125 assay in pleural effusions in elderly patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价老年良、恶性胸腔积液患者血清和胸液中 5种肿瘤标志物单项和联合检测的诊断价值。 方法 采用酶联免疫吸附法同时检测 32例老年肺癌并胸腔积液 (恶性胸腔积液组 )和 30例老年良性胸腔积液患者血清和胸水中细胞角化素蛋白片段 19(CYFRA2 1 1)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶 (NSE)、糖链抗原 15 3(CA15 3)、糖链抗原 19 9(CA19 9)、糖链抗原 12 5 (CA12 5 )水平。 结果 恶性胸腔积液患者血清中上述 5项指标的水平分别为 ( 12 84± 6 4 8) μg/L、( 2 2 0 7± 11 2 5 )μg/L、( 6 5 74± 30 2 6 )kU/L、( 5 6 32± 2 5 6 7)kU/L和 ( 71 86± 31 4 5 )kU/L ,均高于良性胸腔积液患者血清中的水平 (P <0 0 1) ;恶性胸腔积液患者胸水中除NSE外 ,其他 4项指标的水平分别为 ( 18 6 4± 8 15 ) μg/L、( 5 9 31± 2 7 35 )kU/L、( 4 8 2 4± 2 1 5 6 )kU/L和 ( 6 2 16± 2 7 79)kU/L ,均高于良性胸腔积液患者胸水中的水平 (P <0 0 1) ;血清 5种肿瘤标志物平行联合检测可提高诊断的敏感性至90 6 % ,系列联合检测可使特异性提高至 93 3% ;胸液中 4项指标对恶性胸水诊断的敏感性和特异性分别是 :CYFRA2 1 184 4 %和 90 0 % ;CA15 36 2 5 %和 73 3% ;CA19 937 5 %和 6 6 7% ;CA12 55 6 Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic value of five tumor markers in the elderly patients with pleural effusion. Methods Serum and pleural levels of cytokeratin fragment19(CYFRA21 1), neuron specific enalase(NSE), carbohydrate antigen15 3(CA15 3), carbohydrate antigen19 9(CA19 9) and carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125) were assayed in 32 elderly patients with malignant pleural effusions resulting from advanced lung cancer and in 30 elderly patients with benign pleural effusions by ELISA. Results Serum levels of CYFRA21 1, NSE, CA15 3, CA19 9 and CA125 in patients with malignant pleural effusions were (12 84±6 48) μg/L, (22 07±11 25) μg/L, (65 74±30 26) kU/L, (56 32±25 67)kU/L and (71 86±31 45) kU/L, respectively and were significantly higher than those patients with benign pleural effusions (P<0 01). Pleural fluid levels of CYFRA21 1, CA15 3, CA19 9 and CA125 except NSE in patients with malignant pleural effusions were (18 64±27 79) μg/L, (59 31±27 35) kU/L, (48 24±21 56) kU/L and (62 16±27 79) kU/L, respectively and were significantly higher than those patients with benign pleural effusions (P<0 01). The parallel combined testing of five serum tumor markers increased the diagnostic sensitivity to 90 6%, and serial combined testing increased the diagnostic specificity to 93 3%. The sensitivity(%) and specificity (%) of these tumor markers in pleural fluid were CYFRA21 1, 84 4% and 90 0%,CA15 3, 62 5% and 73 3%, CA19 9, 37 5% and 66 7%, CA125; 56 3% and 70 0%, for differentiating malignant from benign effusions. When combined CYFRA21 1 and CA15 3, the sensitivity and specificity were increased (100% and 90%,respectively). Conclusions Five tumor markers in serum and pleural fluid show certain values in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis for malignant pleural effusions in the elderly patients. The combined assay of five tumor markers in serum and the CYFRA21 1 combined with CA15 3 in pleural fluid are helpful and increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing malignant pleural effusions.
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第10期697-700,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 血清 诊断 恶性胸腔积液 胸水 患者 联合检测 老年人 水平 结论 单项 Tumor markers, biological Pleural effusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献10

  • 1范振符 巴德年.肿瘤的免疫学检测.当代免疫学技术与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1998.927-948.
  • 2[1]Fuhrman C, Duche JC, Chouaid C, et al. Use of tumor markers for differential diagnosis of mesothelioma and secondary pleural malignancies. Clin Biochem,2000,33(5):405-410.
  • 3[2]Alatas F, Alatas O, Metintas M, et al. Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions. Lung Cancer,2001,31(1):9-16.
  • 4[3]Miedouge M, Rouzaud P, Salama G, et al. Evaluation of seven tumor markers in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of malignant effusions. Br J Cancer,1999,81(6):1059-1065.
  • 5[4]Ando S, Kimura H, Iwai N, et al. Optimal combination of seven tumor markers in prediction of advanced stage at first examination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res,2001,21(4B):3085-3092.
  • 6[5]Kulpa J, Wojcik E, Reinfuss M, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and neuron-specific enolase in squamous cell lung cancer patients. Clin Chem,2002,48(11):1931-1937.
  • 7[6]Salgia R, Harpole D, Herndon JE 2nd, et al. Role of serum tumor markers CA 125 and CEA in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res,2001,21(2B):1241-1246.
  • 8[9]Romero S, Fernandez C, Arriero JM, et al. CEA, CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 in serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions. Eur Respir J,1996,9(1):17-23.
  • 9[10]Toumbis M, Rasidakis A, Passalidou E, et al. Evaluation of CYFRA 21-1 in malignant and benign pleural effusions. Anticancer Res,1996,16(4A):2101-2104.
  • 10孙巍,王琼,刘娟,张春荣,高学硕,万文徽.血清肿瘤标志在结直肠癌诊断中的应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2000,23(1):11-13. 被引量:60

共引文献142

同被引文献1788

引证文献17

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部