1Giessing M, Kroencke TJ, Taupitz M, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors? Transplantation,2003,76(6):
2Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, et al. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast materiall arrival in the aorta. Radiology, 1997,203(1):109
3Wilman AH, Reiderer SJ, Huston J, et al. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med,1998,40(1):24
4Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiolography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke, 2003,34(3):600
5Goldman JP. New Techniques and applications for magnetic resonance angiography. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 2003,70(6):375
6Haulon S, Lions C, Mcfadden EP, et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2001,22(1):62
7Sawhney R, Kerlan RK, Wall SD, et al. Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Radiology, 2001,220(1):157
8Prince MR, Arnoldus C, Frisoli JK. Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodineated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1996,6(1):162
9Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and K-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1996,6(4):642
10Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology,1998,206(3):683
