期刊文献+

联合测定胸水端粒酶和神经元特异性烯醇化酶对良恶性胸水的鉴别诊断价值 被引量:2

Combination of telomerase assay with neuron specific enolase in diagnostic evaluation between bening and malignant pleural effusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨联合检测肿瘤标记物端粒酶、神经元特异性烯醇化酶 (NSE)对恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值。方法 用聚合酶链反应 酶联免疫吸附分析法 (PCR ELISA)检测胸腔积液端粒酶活性、用放射免疫分析法测定胸腔积液NSE水平 ,共检测了 6 6例恶性胸腔积液和 6 0例非恶性胸腔积液。结果 恶性胸腔积液组的胸腔积液端粒酶和NSE的阳性率分别为 80 .3%和 6 5 .2 %。非恶性胸腔积液的端粒酶和NSE的假阳性率分别为 5 %和 3.3%。联合检测胸腔积液端粒酶和NSE敏感性下降至 6 2 .1% ,但特异性上升至 98.3%。结论 检测胸腔积液端粒酶和NSE对癌性胸腔积液的诊断均有一定的价值 ,联合检测综合诊断更能提高诊断准确率。 Objective To explore the diagnostice value of telome rase assay combined with neuron specific enolase(NSE) in malignant pleural effusion. Methods Telomerase activity and NSE from 66 malignant pleural effusion cases and 60 non-malignant pleural effusion cases were detected by polymerase chain reaction-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(PCR-ELISA) and radial immunosorbent assay(RIA). Results The positive rates of telomerase and NSE in the malignant pleural effusion patients were 80.3% and 65.2%, respectively. The false-positive rates of telomerase and NSE in the non-malignant pleural effusion patients were 5% and 3.3%, respectively. Conclusion The assays of telomerase and NSE of pleural fluidis are valuable to the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. The combination of the two assays increases the accuracy of the diagnosis.
出处 《临床荟萃》 CAS 北大核心 2004年第23期1336-1337,共2页 Clinical Focus
关键词 胸腔积液 恶性 端粒酶 神经元特异性烯醇化酶 pleural effusion, malignant telomerase neuron specific enolase
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

  • 1惠谷,国外医学.遗传学分册,1999年,22卷,3期,142页
  • 2Cheng T Y,J Clin Oncol,1998年,16卷,567页
  • 3陈雯,中华肿瘤杂志,1998年,20卷,261页
  • 4Shay J W,J Clin Pathol,1997年,50卷,106页
  • 5Breslow R A,J Natl Cancer Inst,1997年,89卷,618页
  • 6李宣海,肿瘤标志物的检测与临床,1997年,211页
  • 7陈雯,张桥,万德森,寸凌云,吴成秋,潘志忠.人胃癌结直肠癌组织中的端粒酶活性[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1998,20(4):261-263. 被引量:33
  • 8惠峪,崔景荣.端粒酶活性调控的研究进展[J].国外医学(遗传学分册),1999,22(3):142-145. 被引量:5

共引文献38

同被引文献24

  • 1李新辉,胡晖,杨杰.C-12多肿瘤标志物检测对良恶性腹水鉴别诊断价值的探讨[J].中国医师杂志,2004,6(7):934-936. 被引量:9
  • 2魏仲航,杨杰,魏延君.端粒酶和CYFRA 21-1测定对良恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值[J].中国实验诊断学,2006,10(6):583-585. 被引量:2
  • 3BENNETTR,MASKELL N.Management of malignant pleural effusions[J].Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine,2005,11(4):296-300.
  • 4DIKMEN G,DIKMEN E,KAM M,et al.Diagnostic implications of telomemse activity in pleural effusions[J].Eur Respir,2003,22:422-426.
  • 5ZAMORA J,ABRAIRA V,MURIELA,et al.Meta-Disc:A software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data[J].BMC Med Res Methodoi,2006,6:31.
  • 6YANG C T,LEE M H,LAN R S,et al.Telomerase activity in pleural effusions:diagnostic significance[J].Clin Oncol,1998,16(2):567-573.
  • 7BRAUNCHWEIG R,YAN P,GUILLERET I,et al.Detection of malignant effusions:comparison of a telomerase assay and cytologic examination[J].Diagn Cytopathol,2001,24(3):174-180.
  • 8DIKMEN G,DIKMEN E,KARA M,et al.Diagnostic ireplications of telomerase activity in pleural effusions[J].Eur Respir,2003,22(3):422-426.
  • 9LEE W Y.Limitations of detection of malignancy in pleural effusions using ELISA-based TRAP assay:comparison with cytological examination[J].Cytopathology,2005,16(5):227-232.
  • 10MANEECHOTESUWAN K,LERTWORAWIWAT A,TSCHEIKUNA J,et al.Comparison of telomerase activity between malignant and tuberculous pleural effusions[J].Med AssocThai,2006,89(5):46-54.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部