期刊文献+

抗痉挛技术对偏瘫患者上肢肌痉挛改善的疗效观察 被引量:13

The effect of anti-spasm skills on hemiplegia patients'spasticity of upper limb
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察应用抗痉挛技术对偏瘫患者上肢肌痉挛改善的疗效。方法:经临床确诊的72例偏瘫患者,患侧上肢屈肌张力均在Ashworth评分1—3级之间。治疗组36例,每天接受以抗痉挛技术为主的康复训练1—2小时,疗程为3个月,抗痉挛技术以Bobath易化技术为主,痉挛严重者配夹板固定,持续牵伸;对照组36例,除常规神经科用药外不做正规康复训练。两组治疗前后分别进行比较,评估方法采用Ashworth评分法。结果:治疗组患者治疗前后肌张力有显著性差异(P<0.05);对照组患者前后肌张力比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);治疗前两组患者的肌张力评分无显著性差异(P>0.05);治疗后两组患者的肌张力评分有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:抗痉挛技术在偏瘫患者的康复训练中非常重要,尤其是痉挛出现的早期,效果尤为显著。 Objective:To observe the effect of anti-spasm skills on hemiplegia patients′ spasticity of upper limb. Method:We observed seventy-two hemiplegia subjects with spasticity, their Ashworth′s scales were between one and three scale. They were divided into rehabilitation training group(36 cases) and contrast group(36 cases). The training group received training with anti-spasm skills mainly,1-2 hours per day,for 3 months. Bobath method was one of the main anti-spasm skills.Severe spasmodic upper limbs of those patients had a fixation with splint and continuous stretching. The contrast cases didn′t receive these training.The two groups were evaluated with Ashworth scale before and after the treatment.Result:There was remarkable difference in Ashworth′s scales of the training cases before and after the treatment(P<0.05), while no remarkable difference in the contrast cases(P>05).There was significant difference in Ashworth′s scales between the two groups after the treatment(P<0.05), while no significant difference before the treatment(P>05).Conclusion:The anti-spasm skills in the rehabilitation training is very effective for the patients with hemiplegia spasticity, especially in the early period of spasm.Author′s address Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,the First Affililated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,210029
作者 侯红 王彤
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2004年第6期437-438,共2页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 抗痉挛技术 偏瘫 上肢肌痉挛 康复训练 muscle spasticity anti-spasm skills hemiplegia Bobath skill
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献24

  • 1邱纪方,叶祥明,张天友,李建华.中风偏瘫的全桥运动治疗方案及其安全性初探[J].中国康复医学杂志,1995,10(3):116-118. 被引量:44
  • 2王鸿祥,王左生.脑梗塞患者急性期的康复治疗观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,1996,11(2):74-75. 被引量:40
  • 3程学铭 李世绰.脑血管病流行病学及人群防治[M].,1993.106.
  • 4福井 彦 王世良等(译).老年康复医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1987.44-45.
  • 5王茂斌.中风康复治疗技术:第1版[M].北京:华夏出版社,1993..
  • 6CarrJH Shepherd BS 黄永华 徐本华译.中风病人的运动再学习方案[M].北京:医科大学出版社,1999..
  • 7Hesse S, Konrad M, Uhlenbrock D. Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects[J]. Arch Phy Med Rehabil,1999, 80: 421--426.
  • 8Engardt S.Rising and sitting down in stroke patients. Auditory feedback and dynamic strength training to enhance symmetrical body weight distribution [J].Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl,1994,31:1-57.
  • 9Sharp SA,Brouwer BJ. Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee:efferts on junction and spasticity [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997,78:1231-1236.
  • 10赵汰.现代偏瘫治疗学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1996.174-187.

共引文献527

同被引文献120

引证文献13

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部