摘要
刑事诉讼中大量存在着诉的合并 ,且从理论上分为不同犯罪主体间的合并和同一犯罪主体间的合并。在司法判断中 ,应注意司法认知的运用 ;在判决书内容中 ,应注意演绎推理的前后一致性。针对司法实践中 ,对交通事故责任认定书法律性质的不确定性 ,公安机关依据行政法规所做的责任认定书 ,在性质上为行政文书。在刑事案件中 ,公安机关应依法进行现场勘验 ,制作交通事故成因分析 ,以取代责任认定书 ,更不能将责任认定“解释”为犯罪构成要件。在此基础上 ,“法释 [2 0 0 0 ]33号”司法解释有研究之处。
There are a lot of mergers of action in criminal proceedings, they can be divided into the mergers of different subject of crime and mergers of same subject of crime. Judical cognizance is very important in judical judgment, it must be taken into account. Deduction and inference must be identical in a coritten judgment.In criminal case, public security unit must investigate the scene,analyze the cause of traffic accident, and can not simply draw a confirmation of responsibility. According to this,“Judical Interpretation No.[2000]33” must be perfected.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
2001年第4期97-111,121,共16页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词
责任认定
合并
司法认知
逃逸
confirmation of responsibility
merger
judical cognizance
escape
