期刊文献+

新帝国主义:历时与共时的视角 被引量:4

Neo-imperialism: Diachronic and Synchronic Angles of Analyses
原文传递
导出
摘要 新帝国主义论从多个层面冲击当前的国际关系架构。新帝国主义论不仅是历史的演变、西方文化的产物,更是当今世界力量的体现以及各种国际关系理论发展的必然。其实质是彻底否定民族自决和主权平等原则,主张按美英式“自由民主”体制重组世界秩序,为干涉别国事务提供法理依据。 Neo -imperialism has challenged the framework of international relations in many aspects. The neo-imperialist theory has not only evolved from Western history and culture, but rather is the inevitable result of current power and international relation's growth. The essence of the theory is the total denial of the principle of national autonomy and sovereign equality. It also claims the reorganization of world order in accordance with the US-British democratic models and, therefore, serves as the legal and theoretical basis for their interference of foreign affairs.
作者 官进胜
机构地区 上海行政学院
出处 《上海行政学院学报》 2004年第6期44-50,共7页 The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
关键词 新帝国主义 国际关系 民族自决 主权平等原则 殖民主义 反全球化运动 Neo-imperialism, Diachronic, Synchronic, Evolution, Implication
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1][2]Robert Cooper, Why We still Need Empires, Observer Worldview, Sunday, April 7, 2002, pp23-25.
  • 2[6]James Kurth,Confronting the Unipolar Moment: the American Empire and Islamic Terrorism, Current History, Vol. 101, No.659, December, 2002, pp49-50.
  • 3[7]Joseph S. Nye Jr., The Paradox of American Power, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp85.
  • 4[9]James Kurth,Confronting the Unipolar Moment: The American Empire and Islamic Terrorism, Current History, Vol. 101, No.659, December, 2002, pp4003.
  • 5[10]Sebastian Mallaby, The Reluctant Imperialism, Foreign Affairs, March/April, 2002, pp2-7.

同被引文献65

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部